Teams

Volley Girls

2025 OKCAdult 18 & Over League · 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.20 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-11vs All About That AceWon 21
W#1 DoublesKourtney Aller / Ashley Shrader vs Kaylea Hopfer / Abbey Adams6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSeda Bakir / Jennifer Hasselwander vs Ali Weaver / Michelle Henderson7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAlison Morris / Kelly Shipley vs Lauren Schwartz Winzeler / Lawre Everest2-6, 1-6
2025-05-14vs DAWGSSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAshley Vignola / Lenice Cattley vs Alison Garrett / Evan English3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMorgan Laughlin vs Haley Dobson2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKristi Lepere / Jill van Egmond vs Callie Merritt / Laura Ernst6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJennifer Hasselwander vs Megan Gelmers7-5, 6-3
2025-05-02vs TEAM BEAST/ LADY BEASTWon 31
L#1 DoublesSeda Bakir / Jill van Egmond vs Alyssa Mitchell / Heather Herndon6-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKelly Shipley vs Courteney Mack6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKourtney Aller / Morgan Laughlin vs Jewels Martinez / Cassie Gonzalez6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLenice Cattley / Shelley Pappas vs Grace Mulligan / Sonnie Maughan6-3, 6-3
2025-04-30vs OK/Chavez/18&over3.5WLost 13
L#1 DoublesKourtney Aller / Morgan Laughlin vs Lucia Chavez / Brandi Russell3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTammy Cole / Jill van Egmond vs Dulce Lucio / Nayeli de Loera6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesLenice Cattley vs Thi Nguyen1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSeda Bakir / Carmen Bond vs Kimberly Fox / Kathrynn Cavanaugh3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Kourtney Aller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Ashley Vignola
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Tammy Cole
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Jill van Egmond
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Seda Bakir
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Kristi Lepere
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Lenice Cattley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.09
Lindsay Burnett
published
3.00
Ashley Shrader
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Jennifer Hasselwander
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Shelley Pappas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Alison Morris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Kelly Shipley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Britta Thrift
published 3
2.69
Nicolle Lepak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.68
Carmen Bond
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.65
Morgan Laughlin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kathryn Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristi Lepere + Kourtney Aller4161% games+12.4% vs expected
Shelley Pappas + Jill van Egmond5261% games+9.9% vs expected
Kristi Lepere + Jennifer Hasselwander3250% games+5.3% vs expected
Kourtney Aller + Alison Morris6455% games+4.5% vs expected
Shelley Pappas + Alison Morris111547% games+1.9% vs expected
Nicolle Lepak + Carmen Bond5355% games−0.6% vs expected
Nicolle Lepak + Jennifer Hasselwander13359% games−1.1% vs expected
Ashley Vignola + Lindsay Burnett4749% games−1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kourtney Aller
31W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
3.5
Ashley Vignola
26W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Tammy Cole
27W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jill van Egmond
18W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.19
Seda Bakir
52W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Kristi Lepere
20W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Lenice Cattley
79W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Lindsay Burnett
18W–27L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Ashley Shrader
22W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Jennifer Hasselwander
121W–68L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Shelley Pappas
89W–88L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Alison Morris
55W–79L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Kelly Shipley
16W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Britta Thrift
57W–60L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Nicolle Lepak
59W–60L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Carmen Bond
51W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Morgan Laughlin
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Kathryn Johnson
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.