Teams

BAY CLUB ROSS VALLEY 18AW3.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

25 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Mandy Campbell
published
3.39
Jennifer Tetrick
published
3.33
Betsy Gozzi
published 3.5
3.32
Katie Ives
published
3.29
Kristi Burlingame
published
3.28
Helen Cifuentes
published 3.5
3.22
Fariba Monsefi
published 3.5
3.21
Neha Pyle
published
3.05
3.05
Elizabeth Koch
published 3
3.03
Stefanie Weinstein
published
3.03
Goldie Cheng
published 3
3.01
Laurie Aaronson
published
2.98
Anisha Jagtap
published 3
2.98
Ellen Taylor
published 3.5
2.92
Sara Barker
published
2.92
Clare Moran
published 3
2.84
Karen Tamblyn
published
Bonnie Spitz
published 3
2.74
Leesa Gliebe
published
2.64
Ann Cleveland
published 3
2.62
Michelle Sarti
published
2.62
Susan Kreusch
published
2.53
Jennifer Hamm
published
Nina Brentlinger
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Barker + Teresa Martinique Kelley123 matchesnot enough data
Helen Cifuentes + Anisha Jagtap303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mandy Campbell
29W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.64
Jennifer Tetrick
26W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Betsy Gozzi
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Katie Ives
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Kristi Burlingame
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Helen Cifuentes
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Fariba Monsefi
5W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Neha Pyle
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Teresa Martinique Kelley
14W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Elizabeth Koch
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Stefanie Weinstein
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Goldie Cheng
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Laurie Aaronson
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Anisha Jagtap
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
3.5
Ellen Taylor
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Sara Barker
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Clare Moran
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
Karen Tamblyn
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.84
3
Bonnie Spitz
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leesa Gliebe
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Ann Cleveland
3W–16L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
Michelle Sarti
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Susan Kreusch
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%19%81%
2.62
Jennifer Hamm
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Nina Brentlinger
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.