← Teams

WHRC-Webb (Mixed)

2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.11 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Whitney Mam
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Octavian Tudorache
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Jason Floyd
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.13
Steven Grant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.08
Lauren Mang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Scott Dickinson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.99
Sven Louis
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
DeWayne Ledbetter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.21
Pamela Grant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2023-12-02Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesLauren Mang / Scott Dickinson vs Robin Burak / ALFREDO ALANIS6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJaReda Webb / Sven Louis vs Alana Rhea / Kevin Grant6-2, 6-3
2023-11-12Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesWhitney Mam / Octavian Tudorache vs Jennifer Stevenson / Eric Sowle6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJaReda Webb / DeWayne Ledbetter vs Anna Ringelberg / Kip Stevenson7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPamela Grant / Steven Grant vs Laurel Soot / Scott Soot6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-11-10Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJaReda Webb / Sven Louis vs Ying-Chieh Chen / Amir Hanania6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Mang / Jason Floyd vs Kara Kraft / Michael Barrantes6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPamela Grant / Steven Grant vs Shweta Agrawal / Francisco Pereira de Almeida Tulha6-0, 6-4
2023-10-29Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesWhitney Mam / Octavian Tudorache vs Erin Keyser / Winston Young6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Mang / Jason Floyd vs Natasha Rinard / Jered Cuenco6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKourtnie Katayama / Sven Louis vs Penny Langhammer / Charles Ruhsenberger6-2, 6-0
2023-10-20Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKourtnie Katayama / Scott Dickinson vs Claudia Porter / Dave Sato6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Mang / Jason Floyd vs Surendranadh Movva / Kimberly Shaffer6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJaReda Webb / DeWayne Ledbetter vs Grainne Koeberl / Patrick Koeberl6-4, 6-0
2023-10-15Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLauren Mang / Scott Dickinson vs Julia Henry / Jaime Aranda-Michel6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJaReda Webb / DeWayne Ledbetter vs Brad Johnson / Roxanna Johnson7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesWhitney Mam / Octavian Tudorache vs Nicola Ash / Lawrence Cooper7-6, 7-5
2023-10-07Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesLauren Mang / Jason Floyd vs Rose Lee / Jamil Panni4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJaReda Webb / Sven Louis vs Jessica Hutchins / Derek Ray6-3, 6-4
2023-09-17Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesKourtnie Katayama / Scott Dickinson vs Jing Bennett / Sumit Gupta6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPamela Grant / Steven Grant vs Marjorie Brinck / Gunnar Brinck3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Whitney Mam
30W–27L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Octavian Tudorache
66W–52L career
2%98%0%
3.20
3
Jason Floyd
85W–52L career
0%26%75%
3.19
3
Steven Grant
92W–60L career
0%44%56%
3.13
3.5
Lauren Mang
34W–54L career
14%86%0%
3.08
3
Scott Dickinson
106W–81L career · type A
0%76%24%
3.03
3
Sven Louis
30W–23L career
0%81%19%
2.99
3
DeWayne Ledbetter
51W–55L career
2%79%19%
2.92
2.5
Pamela Grant
35W–45L career
0%95%5%
2.21

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.