Teams

Martin

2023 Frederick Adult 40 & Over · Frederick Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.94 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-17vs CeilWon 20
W#1 DoublesJaime Lewis / Samantha Gass vs Kimberly Wells / Jana Conigliaro5-7, 5-3
W#1 SinglesAline Rodriguez vs Erica Loden6-4, 7-5
2023-04-12vs CeilLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Roy / Aline Rodriguez vs Kimberly Wells / Jana Conigliaro4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-04-03vs CeilWon 10
W#1 SinglesAline Rodriguez vs Elona Novitski6-1, 6-3
2023-04-01vs CeilLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Roy / Aline Rodriguez vs Jana Conigliaro / Cecelia Biesecker3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-03-24Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAline Rodriguez vs Jessica Gong6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2023-03-19vs CeilWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngie Martin / Aline Rodriguez vs Cecelia Biesecker / Mary Shawhan6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-15vs CeilWon 10
W#1 DoublesQuynh Tran / Samantha Gass vs Cecelia Biesecker / Stephanie Porta6-4, 6-1
2023-03-11vs CeilWon 10
W#1 DoublesQuynh Tran / Samantha Gass vs Cecelia Biesecker / Stephanie Porta2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Samantha Gass
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Joy Oliver
published
3.79
Jaime Lewis
published 4
3.74
Aline Rodriguez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Lisa Roy
published
3.63
Laura Henmueller
published 4
3.63
3.60
Carolyn Coletti
published 4
3.53
Christina Truax
published 4
3.50
Sabrina Alban
published
3.34
Peggy Koele
published
3.28
Cora Ho
published 3.5
3.24
Melissa Truffer
published
Millette Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Henmueller + Cora Ho41241% gamesnot enough data
Samantha Gass + Aline Rodriguez314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Samantha Gass
106W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
Joy Oliver
15W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Jaime Lewis
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Aline Rodriguez
111W–95L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.74
Lisa Roy
34W–13L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Laura Henmueller
121W–170L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Christine Pagendarm
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Carolyn Coletti
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Christina Truax
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
Sabrina Alban
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
Peggy Koele
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Cora Ho
120W–87L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
Melissa Truffer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.24
Millette Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.