Teams

SHighsmith

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-13vs SBrodsgaardLost 01
L#1 SinglesKristen Patch vs Ginger Scanlon3-6, 3-6
2022-05-06vs JStallingsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Patch / Tacey Hesmer vs Jeanne Stallings / Helen Velk6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnna Goodmon / Sarah Sims Chesson vs Beth Russo / Hazel Cannon5-7, 6-7
2022-04-20vs DRusnakLost 01
L#2 DoublesKristen Patch / Sally Highsmith vs Rondi Furgason / Natalie Norris2-6, 0-6
2022-04-01vs KKnoblauchLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaeve Gardner / Kristen Patch vs Cayt Kirkman / Catie Cunningham0-6, 2-6
2022-03-18vs JKaulbackLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnna Goodmon / Christine Stone vs Jennifer Kaulback / Wendy Teeter2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Patch / Julie Shaw vs Jessica Williams / Ellina Max1-6, 5-7
2022-03-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Patch / Tacey Hesmer vs Eden Jenkins / Lauren Holmes3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Betsy Carr
published 3.5
3.40
Sally Highsmith
published 3.5
3.31
Tacey Hesmer
published
2.98
Anna Goodmon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Kristen Patch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.40
Courtney Hicks
published 2.5
2.33
Lexie Batchelor
published
2.19
Sarah Sims Chesson
published
2.16
Maeve Gardner
published
2.12
Christine Stone
published 2.5
Jenny Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Patch + Sally Highsmith27567% games+8.6% vs expected
Kristen Patch + Anna Goodmon6355% games+2.5% vs expected
Anna Goodmon + Betsy Carr303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Betsy Carr
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Sally Highsmith
159W–46L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
Tacey Hesmer
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Anna Goodmon
77W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Kristen Patch
82W–63L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
2.5
Courtney Hicks
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%78%22%
2.40
Lexie Batchelor
3W–12L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
2.33
Sarah Sims Chesson
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.19
Maeve Gardner
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.16
2.5
Christine Stone
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Jenny Anderson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.