Teams

LCTA40/Facello/Maybank

USTA 40 & Over Adult Mixed Doubles · 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-31vs LCTA40/Heagney-Barnhart/LTPDIWon 10
W#3 DoublesArt Harper / Ellen Munson vs Dave Heagney / Cece Fraunfelter6-0, 6-1
2023-05-24vs LCTA40/Lawley/St. GeorgeWon 10
W#2 DoublesArt Harper / Ellen Munson vs Don Lawley / June Brownlee6-4, 6-0
2023-05-22vs LCTA40/Lorel/DotyParkLost 01
L#3 DoublesArt Harper / Cindi Katz vs Marc Spears / Lorel Morris5-7, 4-6
2023-04-26vs LCTA40/Wright/MaybankLost 01
L#1 DoublesAshley Pace / Art Harper vs Tracey Zirneklis / Fred Dockery3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Amber Oblinger
published 4
3.51
Ellen Munson
published 3.5
3.50
Art Harper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Allison Soler
published 3.5
Andrew Aydlett
published 3.5
2.97
2.96
Denise Samson
published 3
2.91
Chris Facello
published 3
2.73
Ashley Pace
published 3
2.70
Cindi Katz
published 3
Jessica Becker
published
Joseph Lapolla
published
Sean OConnor
published
Thomas Dearing
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Facello + Allison Soler314 matchesnot enough data
Chris Facello + Denise Samson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amber Oblinger
49W–22L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Ellen Munson
132W–47L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Art Harper
207W–74L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Allison Soler
69W–49L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Andrew Aydlett
31W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Stribling
75W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Denise Samson
50W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Chris Facello
95W–96L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Ashley Pace
53W–63L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Cindi Katz
40W–19L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Jessica Becker
31W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joseph Lapolla
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sean OConnor
83W–51L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Dearing
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.