Teams

SC-Willman

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-10-23vs SC-JohnsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesRay Willman / John Omlin vs Charles McElligott / Steve Lamberson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Vancott / Eric Seaman vs Jeffrey Gillespie / Bruce Johnson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Mainer / Sri Purohith vs Michael Moloney / Mark Switzer6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2021-10-23vs YTC- FergusonWon 30
W#1 DoublesRay Willman / John Omlin vs Robert Darby / Dan Ferguson7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Roth / Andrew Anderson vs Robert Wing / John Asriel6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichael Mainer / Eric Seaman vs Jim Miller / John Fernandez6-2, 6-3
2021-10-22vs WRAC-NoydLost 12
L#1 DoublesRay Willman / John Omlin vs Michael Bendtsen / Bryan Noyd4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Vancott / Eric Seaman vs Matthew Connelly / Kevin Kromholtz4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Roth / Andrew Anderson vs Jim Kellogg / Lance Lorrain6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2018-10-20vs SC-MarvelWon 10
W#1 DoublesRay Willman / John Omlin vs Jerry Henderson / John Moloney6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
John Omlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Andrew Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
David Roth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Eric Seaman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Ray Willman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Michael Mainer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Robert Vancott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sri Purohith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Omlin + Ray Willman423752% games+2.5% vs expected
Robert Vancott + Ray Willman21742% games−4.3% vs expected
Sri Purohith + Michael Mainer4253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Omlin
51W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Andrew Anderson
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
David Roth
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Eric Seaman
51W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ray Willman
37W–51L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Michael Mainer
18W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Robert Vancott
36W–53L career · 2 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
Sri Purohith
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.