Teams

Glam Slam - Butler

2022 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-16Won 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Pyszka / Cammie Furgal vs Kelli O'Donnell / Elizabeth Young6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Clegg / Ashley Vroman-Lee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-09vs T5- Creighton/ SullivantLost 02
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Pyszka / Rita Barufka vs Gretchen Leitch / Maureen St Germain5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCammie Furgal / Jennifer Rammes vs Ellen Gibbons / Jessica Murray1-6, 3-6
2022-06-02Won 30
W#1 DoublesAngela Hoffman / Elizabeth Pyszka vs Valerie Souchack / Laurie Peacock6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Rammes / Cammie Furgal vs Kate Trask / Michelle Antzoulatos6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSuzanne Clegg vs Janann Mercker6-3, 6-0
2022-05-26vs T3- A. Farms/ PlofchanWon 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly Butler / Suzanne Clegg vs Genevieve Gilinger / Megan Sultan7-5, 5-5
W#2 DoublesKaren Flikeid / Patti Bounds vs Debora Aldridge / Anne McDonald6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Rammes / Rita Barufka vs Hannah Auyang / Jennifer Annessa7-5, 6-5
2022-05-17vs T2- R. Creek/ KasperWon 21
L#1 DoublesKrista Horwat / Jennifer Rammes vs Niki Friedman / Christiane Lavin2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Butler / Suzanne Clegg vs Annie Baba / Cheryl Kasper6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatti Bounds / Cammie Furgal vs Michelle Antonelli / Jennifer Malloy6-1, 6-3
2022-05-12vs One Love - FeitWon 20
W#2 DoublesKimianne Lee / Sharon DiRenzo vs Lisa Furgal / Alexandra Kardasilari7-6, 4-4
W#3 DoublesKrista Horwat / Jennifer Rammes vs Tammy Tiko / Marci Welsh7-5, 6-4
2022-05-05vs T5- Creighton/ SullivantLost 12
W#1 DoublesKimianne Lee / Sharon DiRenzo vs Rebecca Norman / Gretchen Leitch6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRita Barufka / Elizabeth Pyszka vs Denise Weinig / Holly Rasmussen5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKimberly Butler / Cammie Furgal vs Mandy Bertin / Karen Collazo6-7, 0-6
2022-04-28vs T4- Broadlands/ SouchackWon 21
L#1 DoublesKimianne Lee / Sharon DiRenzo vs Janann Mercker / Abbey Fecher6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Pyszka / Rita Barufka vs Valerie Souchack / Karen Pantas6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCammie Furgal / Karen Flikeid vs Karin Arnold / Heather Cone6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-21vs T3- A. Farms/ PlofchanWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Pyszka / Angela Kane vs Katie Plofchan / Julie Kane6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSuzanne Clegg vs Megan Sultan7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKimberly Butler / Jennifer Rammes vs Hannah Auyang / Kristen Kilguss6-0, 6-4
2022-04-20vs T2- R. Creek/ KasperSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKimberly Butler / Suzanne Clegg vs Elizabeth Fisher / Lisa Phaneuf6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCammie Furgal / Elizabeth Pyszka vs Mary Beth Williamson / Michelle Antonelli6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Ashley Harper
published 3.5
3.13
Patti Bounds
published
3.05
Cammie Furgal
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.03
Elizabeth Pyszka
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.00
Suzanne Clegg
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.90
Meredith Bearov
published
2.88
Jennifer Rammes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.81
Katrine Pendleton
published
2.77
Kimberly Butler
published
2.69
Sharon DiRenzo
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.64
Karen Flikeid
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.59
Angela Hoffman
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Clegg + Cammie Furgal6854% gamesnot enough data
Cammie Furgal + Jennifer Rammes4446% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Pyszka + Cammie Furgal224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Harper
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Patti Bounds
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Cammie Furgal
146W–89L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.05
3.5
Elizabeth Pyszka
133W–196L career · 13 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Suzanne Clegg
103W–61L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.00
Meredith Bearov
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Jennifer Rammes
49W–40L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
Katrine Pendleton
5W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Kimberly Butler
19W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Sharon DiRenzo
103W–140L career · 7 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Karen Flikeid
115W–100L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Angela Hoffman
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.