Teams

Yadkin/Frank/40+7.5

2023 Yadkin Valley Combo 40 & Over · Women 7.5 - Wednesday Nights

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-10-18vs Yadkin/Smith/40+7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Frank / Shawn McFarlin vs Eva Owens / Nancy Thomas6-4, 6-4
2023-10-15vs Yadkin/Carter/40 +7.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Katie Thompson vs Renae Caldwell / Kim Haynes2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-10-11vs Yadkin/Carter/40 +7.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Dawn Frank vs Kimberly Busse / Melaney Gee1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-30vs Yadkin/Carter/40 +7.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Linda Lowman vs Martha Benbow / Kristin Williamson3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 - Wednesday Nights have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Shawn McFarlin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.70
Lynn Guglielmo
published
3.58
Clarissa Tatum
published 3.5
3.40
Jocelyn Moye
published
3.35
Julie Messner
published
3.32
Rebecca Hartsough
published
3.29
Leah Price
published
3.27
Katie Thompson
published
Arlene Rouse
published 3.5
3.19
Linda Lowman
published
3.14
Connie Song
published 3.5
3.07
Dawn Frank
published 3.5
2.95
Betty Haggard
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Lowman + Lynn Guglielmo3248% games−0.7% vs expected
Linda Lowman + Rebecca Hartsough224 matchesnot enough data
Shawn McFarlin + Lynn Guglielmo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shawn McFarlin
184W–155L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
Lynn Guglielmo
20W–13L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Clarissa Tatum
62W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.58
Jocelyn Moye
21W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.40
Julie Messner
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.35
Rebecca Hartsough
40W–35L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
Leah Price
2W–16L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.29
Katie Thompson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Arlene Rouse
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Lowman
43W–46L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Connie Song
7W–17L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Dawn Frank
13W–33L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Betty Haggard
5W–24L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.