Teams

Racket Power

2024 Montgomery Adult Other Winter Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-03-26vs Love BugsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSandy Thongphok / Kristina Leary vs Carolyn Ridgway / Haas Wallace6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiana Talesnick / Corlyn Krinsky vs Lori Clogg / Erika Psacharopoulos6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-12vs Manor 4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesPasimani Fryauff / Corlyn Krinsky vs Sherri Dixon / Cathy Ventrell-Monsees6-2, 5-5
W#2 DoublesDiana Talesnick / Lucy Yun Yuan vs Maureen Smith / Lisa Johnson6-1, 6-1
2024-02-28vs MagginSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaura McInerney / Sandy Thongphok vs Nancy Eisner / Ann Kopsidas2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCorlyn Krinsky / Diana Talesnick vs Blythe McGinty / Catherine Zimmermann4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-02-23vs Smart Aces 4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesEvelyn Chan / Kristina Leary vs Heather Kadel / Joan-Marie Turchiano6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChanpen Teeranon / Laura Henmueller vs Asli Dervis / Robin Birchfield7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMel Barrett / Anto Faini vs Denise Weinig / Mary Asel0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-02-19vs KorolkoffLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatcharavalai Lawhcharoen / Chanpen Teeranon vs Katie Clark / Liz Christensen0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Darling / Diana Talesnick vs Mary Beth Etherton / Joanne Rome6-7, 4-6
2024-02-16vs Love All 4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAnto Faini / Laura Henmueller vs Brenda Clark / Kate Wesley6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMel Barrett / Diana Talesnick vs Miyuki Sato / Rani Jeeva Nguyen-Khoa6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCorlyn Krinsky / Sandy Thongphok vs Anabela Puhl / Li Ives4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-02-09vs Block/CopelandLost 02
L#1 DoublesChanpen Teeranon / Patcharavalai Lawhcharoen vs Victoria Copeland / Maria Marques1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMel Barrett / Anto Faini vs Monique Bonner / Anne Giampetroni3-6, 0-6
2024-02-08vs BCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Chan / Kristina Leary vs Bridget Foist / Kay Han5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLucy Yun Yuan / Patcharavalai Lawhcharoen vs Julia Latein-Kimmig / Cindee Smith1-6, 4-6
2024-01-12vs Koele/CallahanWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandy Thongphok / Pasimani Fryauff vs Mary Jo Roberton / Peggy Koele7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMel Barrett / Lucy Yun Yuan vs Julie Swartz / Laura Haney6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChanpen Teeranon / Patcharavalai Lawhcharoen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-01-09vs Double TroubleWon 21
W#1 DoublesChanpen Teeranon / Evelyn Chan vs Norma Mendelson / Laleh Mosavati6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSandy Thongphok / Anto Faini vs Paru Rellan / Megan Kessler6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiana Talesnick / Mel Barrett vs Alison Wang / Nicola Goren7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Evelyn Chan
published
3.73
Diana Talesnick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Chanpen Teeranon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.66
Anto Faini
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.63
Laura Henmueller
published 4
3.63
Mel Barrett
published
3.60
Kristina Leary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Sandy Thongphok
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.54
Laura McInerney
published
3.38
Pasimani Fryauff
published
3.34
Corlyn Krinsky
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Lucy Yun Yuan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Carol Darling
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Thongphok + Anto Faini131152% games−1.5% vs expected
Kristina Leary + Sandy Thongphok123 matchesnot enough data
Carol Darling + Pasimani Fryauff033 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Thongphok + Corlyn Krinsky213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Evelyn Chan
22W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Diana Talesnick
90W–34L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Chanpen Teeranon
208W–208L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Anto Faini
226W–104L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.66
4
Laura Henmueller
121W–170L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
Mel Barrett
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Kristina Leary
272W–166L career · 3 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Sandy Thongphok
276W–124L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.56
Laura McInerney
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Pasimani Fryauff
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Corlyn Krinsky
79W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Lucy Yun Yuan
48W–42L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
3
Carol Darling
45W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.