Teams

Village Walk Bonita - Van Alstine

2025 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 Combo 50 & over Men Spring

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-13vs Fiddlers Creek - KeelySplit 11
L#1 DoublesChad McAlpin / Randolph van Alstine vs Steven Cohen / Mark Garrett4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLen Forner / Paul Michaels vs Stan Britton / M Ross Fisher3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-06vs COLLIER/Mintz/Combo50&over7.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesChad McAlpin / Bruce Rosenblatt vs Ben Yocom / Joe Hogan6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-05-01vs Naples Grande - CarranWon 10
W#1 DoublesChad McAlpin / Bruce Rosenblatt vs Mark Greenaway / Richard Lewis6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-22vs Naples Grande - CarranLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Stein / Bruce Rosenblatt vs David Nelson / Kevin O'Brien1-6, 3-6
2025-04-17vs Fiddlers Creek - KeelyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Stein / Bruce Rosenblatt vs Ed Coringrato / Zaheer Karim M D2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-15vs Cambier / PackoWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Stein / Bruce Rosenblatt vs Jeffrey Saviano / John Franta6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-01vs COLLIER/Mintz/Combo50&over7.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesJonathan Hyland / Bruce Rosenblatt vs Ben Yocom / Terry Dean4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & over Men Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Chad McAlpin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Pete Zink
published
3.29
Bruce Rosenblatt
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Henry Bensmiller
published
Jonathan Hyland
published
Len Forner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Stein
published
Paul Michaels
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Randolph van Alstine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Raymond Dobbins
published
Richard Begando
published
Rodger Heaton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pete Zink + Richard Begando213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chad McAlpin
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Pete Zink
22W–8L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Bruce Rosenblatt
56W–71L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Henry Bensmiller
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Hyland
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Len Forner
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Stein
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Michaels
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Randolph van Alstine
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Raymond Dobbins
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Begando
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rodger Heaton
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.