← Teams

CGM-Reed

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Tony Joseph
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.32
John Hapke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
John Wallin
published 3.5
—
Augustin Belindean
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Jon Peters
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Rolf Ellingsen
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.25
Wei Pan
published 3.5
—
Hayward Reed
published 3
—
Kimbal Logan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
David Smiley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 0
Results8 ties
2022-06-12Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / John Hapke vs Jason Hyde / Nick Hooker6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTony Joseph vs Eric Anderson6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJon Peters / Kimbal Logan vs Robert Glenn / Paul OHollaren6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTimothy Johnson / David Smiley vs Dan Tracy / Greg Culver6-2, 6-1
2022-06-11Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesTimothy Johnson / John Hapke vs Levi Carpio / Ryan Yokoyama6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesTony Joseph vs Richard Gronostajski6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-05Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / John Hapke vs Kiran Manda / Jeremy Waterman6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTony Joseph vs Tony Mattos6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDavid Smiley / Jon Peters vs Michael Jansen / Murray Jansen6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKimbal Logan / Wei Pan vs Ryo Kaneko / Dean Waters7-6, 6-2
2022-05-22Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / Timothy Johnson vs Scott Keeney / Richard Sohn6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTony Joseph vs Jesse Inkpen6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKimbal Logan / Wei Pan vs John Magaddino / Zachary Wright6-0, 6-0
2022-05-15Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMark Muckerheide / Tony Joseph vs Larry Liu / Ramon Tuason6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJohn Hapke / Rolf Ellingsen vs Matt Savage / Greg Mikol1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWei Pan / David Smiley vs Joshua Stahly / Peter Allen6-2, 6-4
2022-04-30Lost 0–3
L#1 SinglesTony Joseph vs Kevin Shoop4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / Augustin Belindean vs Nate Larsen / William Allers6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Smiley / Jon Peters vs Manuel Garcia-Fernandez / Frank Mathews6-4, 6-4
2022-04-16Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesTimothy Johnson / Augustin Belindean vs Chris Bartlo / Glenn Eisen6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTony Joseph vs Jesse Inkpen6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / John Hapke vs JOHN KNOX / Zachary Wright4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJon Peters / Kimbal Logan vs Stephen Mileham / John Oh6-2, 6-4
2022-04-09Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / John Hapke vs Jason Hyde / Greg Culver6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Smiley / Mark Muckerheide vs Robert Glenn / Nick Hooker6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesWei Pan / Augustin Belindean vs Dan Tracy / Eric Anderson7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Tony Joseph
19W–20L career
not enough data
—
3.5
John Hapke
81W–77L career
0%97%2%
3.32
3.5
John Wallin
66W–61L career
5%91%4%
3.27
3.5
Augustin Belindean
28W–23L career · type S
not enough data
—
3.5
Jon Peters
33W–36L career · type M
8%87%5%
3.25
3.5
Rolf Ellingsen
43W–38L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Wei Pan
18W–23L career · type M
2%97%1%
3.25
3
Hayward Reed
34W–32L career
not enough data
—
3
Kimbal Logan
39W–57L career
not enough data
—
0
David Smiley
19W–35L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.