Teams

A18 4.0W KI Lightner

2025 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Spring · NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Women Spring

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-04vs A18 4.0W LT KimLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Kim / Heath Mason vs Caroline Evans / Julie Samora1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Fioritto / Liza Brady vs Alicia Blessing / Selena Kim3-6, 2-6
2025-04-13vs A18 4.0W WR GossettWon 21
W#1 DoublesElyse Lightner / Morgan Mills vs Angela Lewis / Courtney Foster7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesErica Wigton vs Kari Gillen5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKerri Dray / Hannah Ruddock vs Elizabeth van Dyke / Caterina Petty4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-30vs A18 4.0W MV2 ZhangSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlana Gallagher / Hannah Ruddock vs Janeen Miklowski / Chipo Jolibois6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesElyse Lightner / Christine Newell vs Pamela Zalba / Kristin Chuko3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-23vs A18 4.0W MV1 UngLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathryn Duvall / Kerri Dray vs Eileen Connell / Kate Bishop6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesElyse Lightner vs Nikki Mercer5-7, 5-7
2025-03-09vs A18 4.0W WR GossettWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarol Leslie / Kathryn Duvall vs Caterina Petty / Lily Gossett6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAlana Gallagher vs Angela Lewis6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChristine Newell / Nicole Fioritto vs Beth Jokhio / Kiyomi Fukamachi0-6, 0-6
2025-02-23vs A18 4.0W MV2 ZhangSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMorgan Mills / Hannah Ruddock vs Kristin Chuko / Marybeth Esposito6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKathryn Duvall / Liza Brady vs Chipo Jolibois / Marian Lauer2-6, 3-6
2025-02-09vs A18 4.0W MV1 UngLost 03
L#1 DoublesHannah Ruddock / Kathryn Duvall vs Caroline Schwartz / Deanne Gibson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNicole Fioritto vs VIctoria Ung5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHeath Mason / Christine Newell vs Eileen Connell / Kathleen Aranavage2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Women Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A18 4.0W MM Brucker8020411157
2A18 4.0W LT Kim7118616163
3A18 4.0W NC2 White6217720200
4A18 4.0W MV1 Ung5316820192
5A18 4.0W SP Atienza53111329232
6A18 4.0W TP Gray44141023206
7A18 4.0W AO Koziara44131124190
8A18 4.0W GR Daily44121228216
9A18 4.0W CC Garson35101431223
10A18 4.0W KI Lightner3581633235
11A18 4.0W MV2 Zhang3591535243
12A18 4.0W PW1 Dewerth3591537267
13A18 4.0W WR Gossett2691533228
14A18 4.0W PW1 Atkinson2681635256
15A18 4.0W NC1 Houston1761837249

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Hannah Ruddock
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Alana Gallagher
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Carol Leslie
published 4
Claire Galiette
published 4
3.69
Morgan Mills
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Erica Wigton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.38
Liza Brady
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.34
Nicole Fioritto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Kathryn Duvall
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Christine Newell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Kerri Dray
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Elyse Lightner
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Heath Mason
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elyse Lightner + Hannah Ruddock7072% games+17.0% vs expected
Liza Brady + Nicole Fioritto2544% games−8.5% vs expected
Kerri Dray + Kathryn Duvall123 matchesnot enough data
Erica Wigton + Elyse Lightner303 matchesnot enough data
Elyse Lightner + Heath Mason303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Ruddock
39W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Alana Gallagher
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Carol Leslie
61W–34L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Claire Galiette
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Morgan Mills
71W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Erica Wigton
43W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Liza Brady
156W–94L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Nicole Fioritto
38W–28L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Kathryn Duvall
17W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.26
3.5
Christine Newell
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kerri Dray
62W–34L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.15
Elyse Lightner
30W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Heath Mason
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.