Teams

TD Academy/WW

2023 Adult 18 & Over 2.5-3.5 Women ESL - NA · 2.5-3.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.67 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-28vs Overserved/OKCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesErica Martinez / Nancy Flaherty vs Callie Merritt / Lacy Remy6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSarai Baird vs Natalie Simon6-1, 6-4
2022-11-01vs String It On!/OKCLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Flaherty / Kay Peters vs Kylie Henson / Molly Morgan1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSarai Baird vs Shaundra North2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJesse Matthews / Holly Baca vs Kristie Hodges / Leslie Lopez2-6, 3-6
2022-10-26vs Racquettes/OKCLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Flaherty / Erica Martinez vs Melody Morfin / Bianca Modi6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesHolly Baca vs Chelsea Ragland1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKay Peters / Esperanza Martinez vs Stephanie Stern / Bailey Bright0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-10-11vs String It On!/OKCWon 21
W#1 DoublesErica Martinez / Taylor Seabolt vs Kylie Henson / Katrina Giron6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesHolly Baca vs Shaundra North1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSarai Baird / Jesse Matthews vs Claire Turmelle / Leslie Lopez6-3, 6-4
2022-10-04vs Racquettes/OKCWon 20
W#1 DoublesSarai Baird / Nathaly Perilla vs Rylie Fischer / Stephanie Stern6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKay Peters / Erica Martinez vs Lauren Horton / Bailey Bright6-1, 6-0
2022-09-27vs Overserved/OKCLost 01
L#2 DoublesKay Peters / Jesse Matthews vs Mindy Bryant / Sheridan Gruber6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-09-20vs String It On!/OKCLost 12
W#1 DoublesErica Martinez / Sarai Baird vs Molly Morgan / Kristie Hodges6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesNathaly Perilla vs Kylie Henson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTaylor Seabolt / Nancy Flaherty vs Katrina Giron / Claire Turmelle6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-09-13vs Racquettes/OKCLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarai Baird / Kay Peters vs Paige Fruits / Melody Morfin6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesErica Martinez vs Chelsea Ragland6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesNancy Flaherty / Nathaly Perilla vs Rylie Fischer / Emily Daniel6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2022-09-06vs Overserved/OKCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarai Baird / Erica Martinez vs Natalie Simon / Kassi Sexton6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesTaylor Seabolt vs Brooke Bogert0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKay Peters / Nancy Flaherty vs Callie Merritt / Lacy Remy6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5-3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Overserved/OKC8120718194
2String It On!/OKC54141330233
3TD Academy/WW36121531241
4Racquettes/OKC2781941277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Tony Daniels
published
Erica Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3
Esperanza Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Holly Baca
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jesse Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Katy Walenz
published
Kay Peters
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Flaherty
published
Nathaly Perilla
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Sarai Baird
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Taylor Seabolt
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Peters + Erica Martinez5092% games+29.6% vs expected
Taylor Seabolt + Esperanza Martinez1534% games−1.2% vs expected
Jesse Matthews + Holly Baca2638% gamesnot enough data
Esperanza Martinez + Jesse Matthews3448% gamesnot enough data
Taylor Seabolt + Jesse Matthews044 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Seabolt + Holly Baca044 matchesnot enough data
Esperanza Martinez + Erica Martinez213 matchesnot enough data
Esperanza Martinez + Holly Baca033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tony Daniels
16W–42L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Erica Martinez
39W–34L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Esperanza Martinez
20W–39L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Holly Baca
5W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jesse Matthews
12W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Katy Walenz
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kay Peters
49W–16L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Flaherty
39W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nathaly Perilla
28W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarai Baird
48W–14L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Taylor Seabolt
14W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.