Teams

CM NAVY

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-27vs CACM BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesLaird Blue / William Dickey vs ARTHUR VAUGHN / Richard Lynn2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJim Roper / Adam Poe vs Daniel Sloane / Daniel Gralla6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRussell Sedmak vs Adam Gunther2-3
L#3 DoublesLee Johnson / Matthew Parsons vs Robert Cohen / Eric Mayer6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-05-20vs SKY REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesAdam Poe / David Tighe vs Jeff Hutcheson / Bentley Hodges3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Dickey vs Ryan Goodale3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMatthew Parsons / Lee Johnson vs Andrew Davis / Andrew Hagen3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesClint Cook vs Philip Briere6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaird Blue / Jim Roper vs Correy Jones / Chris Smith6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-19vs CP BRONZELost 23
L#1 DoublesAdam Poe / David Tighe vs Peter Horsch / Jason Ortiz2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRussell Sedmak vs Austin Scott6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLee Johnson / Matthew Parsons vs Dave Dombrowski / Edmond Barbe4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesWilliam Dickey vs Kevin Stratman6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaird Blue / Jim Roper vs Brett Beard / Howard Sankel6-7, 3-6
2025-05-13vs WP REDLost 14
W#1 DoublesMatthew Parsons / Lee Johnson vs Michael MacHado / Leighton Johnson2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesClint Cook vs Nick Brown1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Dickey / Laird Blue vs Eduardo Gonzalez Sargas / Cyrus Gidfar1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRussell Sedmak vs Andy Fredericks6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAdam Poe / David Tighe vs Bryan Nuber / David Nelson3-6, 3-6
2025-04-29vs WP BLUEWon 32
L#1 DoublesLaird Blue / William Dickey vs Cam Weprin / John Endrud4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRussell Sedmak vs Ky Woodard6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAdam Poe / David Tighe vs Alan Caffey / Mario Crobu3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesClint Cook vs John Davis6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMatthew Parsons / Lee Johnson vs Douglas Smooke / Niiaz Ibragimov7-5, 7-5
2025-04-22vs GTC ORANGELost 14
L#1 DoublesMatthew Parsons / Lee Johnson vs Aaron Siegel / Javier Lehtinen3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesRussell Sedmak vs Benjamin Donovan6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWilliam Dickey / Laird Blue vs Seamus Doyle / Brad Hollis4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesClint Cook vs Jack Fleitman2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAdam Poe / David Tighe vs Edgar Silerio / Tim Lucas2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-15vs DTC GREENLost 05
L#1 DoublesRussell Sedmak / Laird Blue vs Neil Nowak / Christopher Jackson4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Dickey vs Joe Tartell2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Tighe / Adam Poe vs Jason Curran / Jason Sindler1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesClint Cook vs Christopher Smith0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Parsons / Lee Johnson vs Simon Levy / Ted Marolt1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Russell Sedmak
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Clint Cook
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
William Dickey
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.09
Jim Roper
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Adam Poe
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.03
Laird Blue
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.01
Lee Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.00
Matthew Parsons
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.97
David Tighe
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laird Blue + William Dickey4742% games−0.1% vs expected
Lee Johnson + Matthew Parsons3937% games−7.4% vs expected
Adam Poe + David Tighe0630% games−7.6% vs expected
Laird Blue + Jim Roper123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Russell Sedmak
33W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Clint Cook
15W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
William Dickey
13W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Jim Roper
2W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Adam Poe
2W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Laird Blue
6W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Lee Johnson
6W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Matthew Parsons
8W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
3.5
David Tighe
35W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.