Teams

STSC-Hatley

2021 MIXED 55 & Over - OWL · 7.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-05-30vs STSC-HirtWon 21
W#1 DoublesGloria Flager / Thomas Rodriguez vs Daniel Barram / Stephenie Tucker2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Harder / Cheri Wulf vs Janet Lui-Hansen / John Cherry7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAnnette Hatley / Mickey Hatley vs Glen Soltau / Lynn Goeke7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2021-05-29vs STSC-HirtLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Harder / Gloria Flager vs Daniel Barram / Stephenie Tucker6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJerry Johnson / Carol Hoffos vs John Cherry / Janet Lui-Hansen5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesThomas Rodriguez / Cheri Wulf vs Glen Soltau / Nancy Chamberlain3-6, 5-7
2021-05-29vs ESTC-BodeenLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarol Hoffos / Jerry Johnson vs Ronald Bodeen / Amanda Jordan6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMickey Hatley / Gloria Flager vs Edmund Yang / Karen Bodeen6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesThomas Rodriguez / Cheri Wulf vs Anthony Losco / Paula Thompson2-6, 3-6
2021-05-29vs ESTC-BodeenLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Harder / Gloria Flager vs Thomas Jordan / Kathy Thompson6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJerry Johnson / Carol Hoffos vs Ronald Bodeen / Amanda Jordan7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMickey Hatley / Annette Hatley vs Christopher Casey / Christina Spencer0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ESTC-Bodeen408412103
2STSC-Hirt136616134
3STSC-Hatley134817134

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Gloria Flager
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Carol Hoffos
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Cheri Wulf
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Annette Hatley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jerry Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mickey Hatley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mickey Hatley + Annette Hatley9850% gamesnot enough data
Jerry Johnson + Gloria Flager5168% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Rodriguez + Gloria Flager4263% gamesnot enough data
Carol Hoffos + Jerry Johnson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gloria Flager
104W–53L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Carol Hoffos
53W–37L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Cheri Wulf
64W–59L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Annette Hatley
88W–67L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
2.90
Jerry Johnson
24W–15L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mickey Hatley
16W–18L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Thomas Rodriguez
22W–30L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.