Teams

GRC:55+ 8.0:Brown/Dawson

2021 SCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 8.0 55 & Over Adult Women - 1

14 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesMargo Smith / Janet Bashford vs Karen Cushnie / Ellen O'Donnell3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Bartow / Dawn Hone vs JoAnn Lopez / Sue Broderick2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiane Martin-Tryhane / Denise Cohen vs Barbara Kiselak / Audra Edele6-0, 6-3
2021-06-13vs OGTA:Mood Swings:BarnwellWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaurie Curtis / Janet Bashford vs Cynthia Curry / Nora Holmes2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMargo Smith / Lisa Dawson vs Andrea Hessekiel / Nadine Shaoul6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDenise Cohen / Maria Sanchez vs Deborah Barnwell / Janice Frank6-1, 6-3
2021-05-23vs WRC:Well Seasoned:GriffinWon 21
W#1 DoublesMargo Smith / Lisa Dawson vs Sharon Barns / Kendal Gaillard7-6, 4-4
L#2 DoublesDenise Cohen / Maria Sanchez vs Leti Manuel / Mari Ullyett2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnne Castine / Wanda Rettagliata vs Doris Bender / Devon Delaney7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLaurie Curtis / Janet Bashford vs Julie Mooney / Jackie Zoldy6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMargo Smith / Denise Cohen vs JoAnn Lopez / Nancy McDonough6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnne Castine / Dawn Hone vs Cynthia Pezzullo / Barbara Kiselak7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2021-05-02vs OGTA:Mood Swings:BarnwellWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeide Marie Bliss / Dawn Hone vs Nora Holmes / Cynthia Curry6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJan Wild / Denise Cohen vs Janice Frank / Andrea Hessekiel7-5, 5-1
W#3 DoublesLaurie Curtis / Wanda Rettagliata vs Suzanne Corbin / Hildi Todrin6-3, 6-0
2021-04-24vs WRC:Well Seasoned:GriffinLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Martin-Tryhane / Wanda Rettagliata vs Sharon Barns / Kendal Gaillard1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Bartow / Dawn Hone vs Mari Ullyett / Elizabeth Griffin3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnne Castine / Jan Wild vs Gretchen Kilmartin / Dunja Sypher6-7, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 55 & Over Adult Women - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WRC:Well Seasoned:Griffin0611714128
2GRC:55+ 8.0:Brown/Dawson0612615148
3MRC:55 Shades of Grey:Ross/Cushnie0612616155
4OGTA:Mood Swings:Barnwell0611734207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Lisa Dawson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Denise Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
Diane Martin-Tryhane
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Dawn Hone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.44
Anne Castine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Jan Wild
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Janet Bashford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Lombino
published
Margaret Kienzle
published
Margo Smith
published
Maria Sanchez
published
Susan Bartow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Wanda Rettagliata
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Wild + Lisa Dawson6257% games+21.6% vs expected
Margaret Kienzle + Lisa Dawson6167% games+11.6% vs expected
Dawn Hone + Susan Bartow4159% games+7.0% vs expected
Janet Bashford + Margo Smith8857% games+3.3% vs expected
Dawn Hone + Margaret Kienzle12755% games+1.5% vs expected
Margo Smith + Denise Cohen4849% games−1.2% vs expected
Susan Bartow + Margaret Kienzle15261% games−1.7% vs expected
Dawn Hone + Lisa Dawson131250% games−3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lisa Dawson
178W–134L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Denise Cohen
71W–47L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Diane Martin-Tryhane
23W–20L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Dawn Hone
224W–150L career · 4 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Anne Castine
97W–92L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.44
4
Heide Marie Bliss
93W–98L career · no lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
3.42
Jan Wild
110W–93L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Janet Bashford
48W–32L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Leslie Lombino
49W–75L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Margaret Kienzle
90W–49L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Margo Smith
37W–38L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Maria Sanchez
9W–14L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Bartow
32W–9L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Wanda Rettagliata
33W–55L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.