Teams

Raver/Hanson Winter

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 4.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-02-19vs CarlsonWon 31
W#1 DoublesCharles Weed / Aaron Johnson vs Keegan Terrone / Peter Rietgraf6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesWill Weyenberg vs Lukas Carlson6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGuillermo Arriondo / Christopher Toal vs Julian Bannach / Timothy Ohtake3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesAndrew Argall vs Tan Nguyen6-1, 6-0
2025-02-12vs Magnuson PIT W25Lost 13
L#1 DoublesMark van Ert / Aaron Johnson vs Paul Schroeder / Craig Raway6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesWill Weyenberg vs Bryce Johnson6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRobert Mele / Christopher Toal vs Brandon Kuether / Tou Ger Xiong3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesSam Teitelbaum vs Isa Kibira4-6, 3-6
2025-02-05vs Kindler-Winter 2024Lost 23
W#1 DoublesAaron Johnson / Will Weyenberg vs Chris Kindler / Brandon Vaughn5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSam Teitelbaum vs Logan James4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Crosby / Guillermo Arriondo vs Jay Knutson / Charles Gould3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesPaul Jensen vs David Yesilevskiy5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Colburn / Mark Vyvyan vs Riley Washington / Nicholas Oris5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-01-22vs Seltz/Moran - WinterLost 05
L#1 DoublesMatthew Crosby / Aaron Johnson vs Christian Rovn / Rick Slachta2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAndrew Argall vs Paul Kolenich7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Colburn / Christopher Toal vs Justin Long / Robert Crockarell3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSam Teitelbaum vs Michael Montalbano1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Jensen / Mark van Ert vs Jesse Raymond / Jake Seltz3-6, 2-6
2025-01-15vs Stan: Flight CrewLost 04
L#1 DoublesCharles Weed / Will Weyenberg vs Jack Linder / Andrew Spence3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAndrew Argall vs Josh Ichen6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMark Vyvyan / Christopher Toal vs Brad Walter / Matthew Lindsay0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesPaul Jensen vs Kevin Krause6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Argall
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Will Weyenberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.08
Matthew Crosby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.08
Robert Mele
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.07
Sam Teitelbaum
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.05
Scott Raver
published
4.01
Erik Gustafson
published 4.5
3.96
Mark Vyvyan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.95
Christopher Toal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Paul Jensen
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.92
Charles Weed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Guillermo Arriondo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Mark van Ert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Benjamin Colburn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Mele + Mark van Ert3350% games+6.9% vs expected
Guillermo Arriondo + Benjamin Colburn1735% games+5.3% vs expected
Matthew Crosby + Charles Weed3940% games+0.9% vs expected
Guillermo Arriondo + Erik Gustafson2447% games−0.0% vs expected
Will Weyenberg + Erik Gustafson2443% games−0.8% vs expected
Matthew Crosby + Erik Gustafson2645% games−0.9% vs expected
Robert Mele + Benjamin Colburn1535% games−1.2% vs expected
Guillermo Arriondo + Robert Mele1739% games−14.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Argall
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Will Weyenberg
22W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.22
Matthew Crosby
19W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.08
Robert Mele
24W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
Sam Teitelbaum
10W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
4.07
Scott Raver
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.05
4.5
Erik Gustafson
14W–39L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.01
Mark Vyvyan
6W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Christopher Toal
9W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
Paul Jensen
16W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Charles Weed
18W–43L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Guillermo Arriondo
12W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
Mark van Ert
20W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Benjamin Colburn
41W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.