Teams

LA - Kiss My Ace 4.5

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over – LA · LA - Women 4.5

20 players · average NTRP 4.44 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-21vs LA - DST Ladies 4.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Sona Arutyunyan vs Ashley Lin / Liz Sanchez6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAbbigail Fietzer vs Ashrita Nagpal0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJANE CHUN / Shirley Fong vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-14vs LA - Slayin' All DaySplit 11
L#2 DoublesShirley Fong / Julie Kanjanapangka vs Chandler Nguyen / Katherine Wu4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesRoselle Paskus vs Shanna Reznik4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-31vs LA - Team AllisonWon 21
L#1 DoublesTiffany Lee / Sona Arutyunyan vs Amy Karr / Ayanna Maharry6-7, 1-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKarla Garcia / Shirley Fong vs Karen Indeglia / Susan Raifman6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesIsis Anderson vs Chloe Kishel6-2, 6-3
2025-05-18vs LA - HitWomenWon 21
L#1 DoublesAbbigail Fietzer / Shirley Fong vs Diana Decardenas / Sonia Onochie3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesIsis Anderson vs Susan Miller6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMala Lee / Sona Arutyunyan vs Joanna Ku / Phyllis Crotty6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Margaret Gray vs Clarissa Requiestas / Aleyeh Roknaldin2-6, 2-6
2025-05-04vs LA - Slayin' All DayWon 10
W#2 DoublesSona Arutyunyan / Isis Anderson vs Chandler Nguyen / Shanna Reznik2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-19vs LA - HitWomenLost 13
L#1 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Kimberly Strickland vs Sonia Onochie / Darcy Simon3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSona Arutyunyan vs Mimi Kahn3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJANE CHUN / Abbigail Fietzer vs Deanna Schlesinger / Emily Marmol3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMINA RICABAR / Ella Kenney vs Carrie Kisker / Cindy Suby6-3, 6-2
2025-04-13vs LA - Team AllisonWon 21
W#1 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Sona Arutyunyan vs Aubrey Karr / Linda Govel6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Kanjanapangka / Isis Anderson vs Jennifer Lawler / Chloe Kishel4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMINA RICABAR / Caridad Coto vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Clare Burks
published 4.5
4.19
Ryan Hickman
published
4.18
Isis Anderson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.17
Ella Kenney
published
4.14
Sona Arutyunyan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4.5
4.11
Kimberly Strickland
published
4.08
Mala Lee
published
4.08
Shirley Fong
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.07
Vilayvanh Shah
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4.5
4.07
Roselle Paskus
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Jennie Speciale
published
4.02
Caridad Coto
published 4.5
3.96
MINA RICABAR
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Tami Reyes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.86
Abbigail Fietzer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Martina Ricabar
published
3.83
JANE CHUN
published
3.83
Tiffany Lee
published
3.80
Margaret Gray
published
3.51
Karla Garcia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vilayvanh Shah + Sona Arutyunyan361557% games+1.5% vs expected
Isis Anderson + Sona Arutyunyan314 matchesnot enough data
Jennie Speciale + Kimberly Strickland123 matchesnot enough data
Abbigail Fietzer + Roselle Paskus213 matchesnot enough data
Roselle Paskus + Vilayvanh Shah213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Clare Burks
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Hickman
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Isis Anderson
95W–40L career · 10 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Ella Kenney
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Sona Arutyunyan
174W–87L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
4.14
Kimberly Strickland
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
Mala Lee
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Shirley Fong
89W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Vilayvanh Shah
194W–89L career · 8 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
4.5
Roselle Paskus
101W–105L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.07
Jennie Speciale
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Caridad Coto
1W–14L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.02
4.5
MINA RICABAR
141W–103L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.96
Tami Reyes
231W–92L career · 4 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.92
4
Abbigail Fietzer
84W–115L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
Martina Ricabar
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.83
JANE CHUN
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Tiffany Lee
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.83
Margaret Gray
20W–22L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Karla Garcia
2W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.