Teams

Double Trouble

2026 Adult 55 and Over League · 7.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-17vs MCC WahinesWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Armstrong / Kelly Thayer vs Jan Bryan / Cynthia Sawyer4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDiane Chaves / Pamela Singlehurst-kapisi vs Merrill Ranken / Anna Zettergren6-4, 6-2
W#3 Doublesshar martin / Ann Marugaki vs Mindy Armour / Martha Hecker6-2, 6-2
2026-05-09vs Wailea High FivesWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Armstrong / Kelly Thayer vs Barbara Botkin / Bonnie Gray6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 Doublesshar martin / Amanda Tillson vs Cammy Clark / Alice Koniges6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKarla Nutt / Tesha Newman vs M Beverly Rivers / Leslie Wilshusen6-3, 6-1
2026-05-03vs Lahaina LobstersWon 30
W#1 DoublesPamela Henry / Carol Lam vs Celeste Abate / Kari Alexander7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesClarita Balala / Diane Chaves vs Nancy Cross / Barbara Skaggs6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnn Marugaki / Lore Lee Robello vs Nan Li / Nancy Sutherland2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-05-01vs MCC WahinesWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarol Lam / Ann Marugaki vs Jan Bryan / Cynthia Sawyer3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLore Lee Robello / Trudi Vierra vs Christina Haywood / Mina Welch6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTesha Newman / Karla Nutt vs Sonia Kreag / Jori Spencer6-1, 6-3
2026-04-19vs Wailea High FivesWon 30
W#1 DoublesClarita Balala / shar martin vs Debbie Day / Liezl Lao6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPamela Singlehurst-kapisi / Trudi Vierra vs Gage Beerer / Colette Watanabe6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPamela Henry / Carol Lam vs Barbara Grandon / Gaela Prince6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-12vs Lahaina LobstersWon 30
W#1 DoublesPamela Henry / Amanda Tillson vs Celeste Abate / Kathy Vicars7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTrudi Vierra / Pamela Singlehurst-kapisi vs Barbara Skaggs / Kari Alexander6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Armstrong / Kelly Thayer vs Nancy Sutherland / Evangeline Roxas-Butlig6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Trudi Vierra
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.60
Tesha Newman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.51
Susan Armstrong
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.50
Pamela Singlehurst-kapisi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Kelly Thayer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
shar martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Karla Nutt
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.36
Diane Chaves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Pamela Henry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Clarita Balala
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Amanda Tillson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Carol Lam
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Ann Marugaki
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Lore Lee Robello
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Trudi Vierra + Susan Armstrong5065% games+14.1% vs expected
Pamela Henry + Carol Lam12166% games+8.7% vs expected
Trudi Vierra + Clarita Balala14167% games+7.6% vs expected
Susan Armstrong + Kelly Thayer11172% games+7.5% vs expected
Lore Lee Robello + Pamela Henry3256% games+7.1% vs expected
Trudi Vierra + Pamela Singlehurst-kapisi13172% games+7.1% vs expected
Trudi Vierra + Pamela Henry9264% games+5.7% vs expected
Trudi Vierra + Karla Nutt4357% games+5.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Trudi Vierra
146W–95L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.61
3.5
Tesha Newman
86W–61L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.60
Susan Armstrong
56W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Pamela Singlehurst-kapisi
19W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Kelly Thayer
61W–54L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
shar martin
36W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Karla Nutt
102W–66L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Diane Chaves
116W–106L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
Pamela Henry
91W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Clarita Balala
118W–101L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Amanda Tillson
55W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Carol Lam
72W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ann Marugaki
75W–74L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Lore Lee Robello
144W–98L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.