Teams

Pipkin

Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.92 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-19vs RVCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Drake / Numneung Koedkietpong vs Nicole Tullo / Lauren Jo Shipley7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCassidy Cruz vs Karin Weiner3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMadison Pipkin / Priya Narahari vs Jasmine Nichole Shaw-Morris / Sudha Lavu5-7, 4-6
2026-07-12vs A to ZWon 20
W#1 DoublesRenee Lee / Adrienne Supino vs Ava Steinberger / Katherine Hederick6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMadison Pipkin / Priya Narahari vs Zoe Sanderson / Debbie Sharnak6-1, 7-6
2026-06-28vs Girl Pao-erLost 12
W#1 DoublesCamille Townsend / Stephanie Drake vs Nataliya Bredikhina / Madeline de Faber-Schumacher6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNumneung Koedkietpong vs Samantha Nanere2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCassidy Cruz / Madison Pipkin vs Meredith Lee / Chloe Ouellet-Pizer7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2026-06-21vs RVCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Drake / Abigail Caddick vs Liz Wetherill / Lauren Jo Shipley1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAisha Bhimla / Priya Narahari vs Sudha Lavu / Darcy Rabenda0-6, 1-6
2026-06-16vs A to ZWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie Drake / Madison Pipkin vs Zoe Sanderson / Rebecca Halpern6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesAbigail Caddick vs Kelly Hopkins6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPriya Narahari / Cassidy Cruz vs Alyssa Burkhardt / Isabel Mejia6-3, 6-4
2026-06-07vs Girl Pao-erWon 21
W#1 DoublesRenee Lee / Madison Pipkin vs Mo Bertsch / Samantha Nanere4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHannah Pipkin vs Madeline de Faber-Schumacher5-5
W#2 DoublesCassidy Cruz / Camille Townsend vs Sasha Radulski / Anne Marie Devlin6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Girl Pao-er061449106
2RVCC0612613134
3Pipkin069922183
4A to Z0611735213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.91
Camille Townsend
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.79
Hannah Pipkin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.70
Madison Pipkin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.67
Adrienne Supino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.64
Cassidy Cruz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 5
4.52
Stephanie Drake
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.44
Abigail Caddick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 5
4.43
Priya Narahari
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.29
Aisha Bhimla
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Numneung Koedkietpong
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Renee Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hannah Pipkin + Madison Pipkin10654% games+3.1% vs expected
Hannah Pipkin + Stephanie Drake0537% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Camille Townsend
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.91
Hannah Pipkin
39W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.79
5
Madison Pipkin
139W–57L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.70
5
Adrienne Supino
44W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Cassidy Cruz
8W–16L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.64
Stephanie Drake
18W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.52
5
Abigail Caddick
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.44
Priya Narahari
7W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.43
4.5
Aisha Bhimla
26W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
Numneung Koedkietpong
21W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Renee Lee
62W–34L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.