Teams

HH40/Hawley/Oldfield

Combo 40 & Over · 40+ 6.5 Combo Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40+ 6.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Karen Grygiel
published
Diana Fitzgerald
published 3.5
3.21
Debra Albanese
published 3.5
3.13
Erika Hawley
published 3
2.87
Pam Gower
published
Gerry Hall
published 3
2.70
Gayle Curtiss
published 3
2.65
Ellen Chen
published 3
2.56
Rose Donnelly
published
Alisa Long
published
Donna Winland
published
Madeline Harrell
published
Mary Cincotta
published
Pat Conti
published
Suzanne Hatcher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rose Donnelly + Gerry Hall5554% games+9.5% vs expected
Donna Winland + Pam Gower314 matchesnot enough data
Rose Donnelly + Suzanne Hatcher303 matchesnot enough data
Pam Gower + Erika Hawley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Grygiel
18W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Diana Fitzgerald
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Debra Albanese
11W–19L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Erika Hawley
49W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.13
Pam Gower
25W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Gerry Hall
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Gayle Curtiss
19W–26L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Ellen Chen
7W–23L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
Rose Donnelly
19W–20L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.56
Alisa Long
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Donna Winland
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Madeline Harrell
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Cincotta
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pat Conti
16W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Hatcher
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.