Teams

Paseo - Zimmer

2026 LeeCharlotte Adult 18 & Over Spring · 3.5 W

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-07vs Gateway - BlackmonLost 01
L#3 DoublesBeverly Gostomski / Anne Prickett vs Alisha Daines / Beth Workman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-04vs Courts at Cape Coral - RiccioWon 10
W#3 DoublesBeverly Gostomski / Anne Prickett vs Nilia E Marti / Val Pacenta7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-30vs Cypress Lake - ManiboWon 10
W#3 DoublesSadie Gammell / Rhonda Allen vs Marcia Disharoon / Mary Witham6-4, 6-2
2026-04-15vs UTC - GonzalezLost 02
L#2 DoublesRhonda Allen / Beverly Gostomski vs Beryl Gonzalez / Susan Jacoby4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesColleen Benson / Anne Prickett vs Betsy Coleman / Diann Cimring1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Amanda Patten
published 3.5
3.41
Vickie Kirsten
published
3.36
Leticia Garcia
published
3.31
Donna Douglass
published
3.29
Shelly Zimmer Wald
published
3.27
Colleen Benson
published 3.5
Diane Borillo
published 3.5
3.25
Jill Hoffman
published
3.24
Leesa Cotton
published
3.24
Sadie Gammell
published
3.23
Lisa DeLauder
published
3.20
Catherine Senior
published 3.5
3.16
Beverly Gostomski
published 3.5
3.10
Anne Prickett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Rhonda Allen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa Cirrone
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leesa Cotton + Leticia Garcia3251% games−4.3% vs expected
Rhonda Allen + Leesa Cotton5158% gamesnot enough data
Vickie Kirsten + Leticia Garcia3254% gamesnot enough data
Rhonda Allen + Lisa DeLauder303 matchesnot enough data
Lisa DeLauder + Jill Hoffman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Patten
23W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
Vickie Kirsten
34W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Leticia Garcia
35W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
Donna Douglass
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Shelly Zimmer Wald
7W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Colleen Benson
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Diane Borillo
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jill Hoffman
13W–7L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Leesa Cotton
22W–13L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Sadie Gammell
10W–10L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
Lisa DeLauder
7W–5L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Catherine Senior
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Beverly Gostomski
7W–9L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Anne Prickett
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Rhonda Allen
18W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Lisa Cirrone
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.