Teams

RGAC/DopkinsW3.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.0

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-25vs Samuell Grand/Saunders W3.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Dopkins / Victoria Drew vs Emily Hildebrand / Kristy Mathot0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesBarbara Saetz vs Emily Perry6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShelley Weidenbach / Debbi Garcia vs Jill Scovell / Jamie Bricker2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Smith / Ellen Palmer vs Haley Thomas / Haley Collard5-7, 5-7
2025-02-14vs DCC/Bennett-McCullough W3.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesLinda Trahan / Victoria Drew vs Laura McCullough / Adair Webb1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBarbara Saetz vs Ale Hage6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesShelley Weidenbach / Melissa Cain vs Daley Bennett / Jenny Kearns2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Dopkins / Amy Smith vs Adrienne Pulliam / Hillary Murff5-7, 4-6
2025-01-31vs Greenhill/Wilson-Tufro-Garcia W3.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesVictoria Drew / Linda Trahan vs Pamela Sewak / Dawn Goodrich2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBarbara Saetz vs Delores Rodriguez0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Cain / Shelley Weidenbach vs Laura Ferguson / Tavenner Rogers7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Smith / Debbi Garcia vs Candace Berde / Brooke West6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Linda Trahan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Debbi Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Ellen Palmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Shelley Weidenbach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Ruth Howard
published
2.54
Melissa Cain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Jennifer Dopkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Barbara Saetz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Victoria Drew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Cain + Shelley Weidenbach11127% games−12.1% vs expected
Victoria Drew + Ruth Howard1436% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Trahan
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Debbi Garcia
9W–13L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
Ellen Palmer
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Shelley Weidenbach
4W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
Ruth Howard
12W–22L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Melissa Cain
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Jennifer Dopkins
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
2.5
Barbara Saetz
5W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
Victoria Drew
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.