Teams

HHTL75/Lindsey

75 & Over · 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-13vs LCTA75/NemesLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Lindsey / Harvey Varnet vs Frank Grubb / Leon Geller1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Fatzinger / Donald Benjamin vs Marvin Grooms / Dick Nemes6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLarry Fisher / Greg Geelhood vs Jack Buchanan / Kenneth Dauses6-4, 6-3
2024-10-12vs UPTA75A/Uhlig/Keowee KeyLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Fatzinger / Donald Benjamin vs Kenneth Uhlig / Larry Berridge3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEric Bretzel / Konrad Tuchscherer vs Larry Wingard / Dean Twedt1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLarry Fisher / Greg Geelhood vs Philip Epstein / Lowell Weaner7-5, 6-0
2024-10-12vs GSTL75/Hetzer/INDLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonald Benjamin / Joseph Hardy vs Robert Stone / Joey Singleton3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKonrad Tuchscherer / Robert Lindsey vs Robert Price / Arne Pedersen4-1
W#3 DoublesGreg Geelhood / Larry Fisher vs Fernando Astorga / Conrad Hetzer7-5, 6-2
2024-10-11vs LATA75/Crosby/MWLost 12
W#1 DoublesRobert Lindsey / Harvey Varnet vs Richard Fallon / Jerry Smith6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKonrad Tuchscherer / Joseph Hardy vs George Freeman / William Taylor1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Fatzinger / Donald Benjamin vs Harry Crosby / Jonathan Lipsi5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Brian Fatzinger
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Donald Benjamin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Eric Bretzel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Greg Geelhood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Harvey Varnet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Hardy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Konrad Tuchscherer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Larry Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Lindsey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Larry Fisher + Greg Geelhood6551% games+4.7% vs expected
Brian Fatzinger + Donald Benjamin1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brian Fatzinger
19W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Donald Benjamin
9W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Eric Bretzel
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Greg Geelhood
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Harvey Varnet
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joseph Hardy
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Konrad Tuchscherer
4W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Larry Fisher
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Lindsey
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.