Teams

Cartee 55s 4.0W Mon PM

2026 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-04vs Albright 55s 4.0W Mon PMWon 20
W#1 DoublesNicola Parrish / Deborah DiNoto vs Lauran Epstein / Karyn Efird6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMimi Cartee / Kara Ray vs Aprille Black / Virginia Christman6-2, 6-1
2026-04-27vs Smith 55s 4.0W Mon PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoyce Perez / Jill Perez vs Lynne Murray / Carrie Ganim0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAndra Schwartz / Patty Craig vs Caroline McAlister / Lynn Jacoby6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNicola Parrish / Beverly Tuttle vs Suzanne Rudy / Nancye Milam6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesCatherine Stopka / Patty Craig vs Terri Shantry / Paige Yates6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMimi Cartee / Jill Perez vs Bonnie Satterfield / Donna Warrick6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKara Ray / Nicola Parrish vs Tammie Hughes / Lisa Roach6-4, 6-2
2026-04-06vs Brown 55s 4.0W Mon PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesCatherine Stopka / Beverly Tuttle vs Shawn McFarlin / Catherine Tanner4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoyce Perez / Jill Perez vs Pam McAmis / Kathy Pace6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKara Ray / Andra Schwartz vs Kathy Brown / Virginia Easley6-3, 6-3
2026-03-30vs Kroeger/Satterfield 55s 4.0W Mon PMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMimi Cartee / Joyce Perez vs Joy Martin / Terri Shantry6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAndra Schwartz / Jayne Johnston vs Tammie Hughes / Lisa Roach6-1, 6-2
2026-03-26vs Smith 55s 4.0W Mon PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Perez / Joyce Perez vs Carrie Ganim / Lynne Murray4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMimi Cartee / Catherine Stopka vs Kelly Miller / Ann Morris6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAndra Schwartz / Jayne Johnston vs Cookie Guarini / Caroline McAlister6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2026-03-23vs Albright 55s 4.0W Mon PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicola Parrish / Deborah DiNoto vs Holly Parr / Kelly Parr4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMimi Cartee / Jayne Johnston vs Susan Parlier / Maggie Riley6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJoyce Perez / Jill Perez vs Britt Flanagan / Karyn Efird3-6, 3-6
2026-03-02vs Brown 55s 4.0W Mon PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Stopka / Beverly Tuttle vs Shawn McFarlin / Catherine Tanner2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Johnson / Jill Perez vs Libby Strickland / Dell Barbee3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNicola Parrish / Deborah DiNoto vs Carolyn Pellerin / Yukari Matsuoka4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Carpenter 55s 4.0W Mon AM902529145
2Brown 55s 4.0W Mon PM6218617203
3Cartee 55s 4.0W Mon PM6216821187
4Robinson/Rosenbower 55s 4.0W Mon AM54141327224
5Smith 55s 4.0W Mon PM44121228218
6Kroeger/Satterfield 55s 4.0W Mon PM2671738234
7Albright 55s 4.0W Mon PM2671738259
8Schmid/Bethel 55s 4.0W Mon AM2781941298
9Clancy 55s 4.0W Mon AM2772043291

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jill Perez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Beverly Tuttle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Andra Schwartz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Mimi Cartee
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.73
Nicola Parrish
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.72
Kara Ray
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Catherine Stopka
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.39
Patty Craig
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Joyce Perez
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Deborah DiNoto
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Tuttle + Catherine Stopka4448% games−3.2% vs expected
Deborah DiNoto + Nicola Parrish1445% games−3.6% vs expected
Jill Perez + Joyce Perez134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Perez
29W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Beverly Tuttle
15W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Andra Schwartz
6W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Mimi Cartee
16W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Nicola Parrish
3W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Kara Ray
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Catherine Stopka
9W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Patty Craig
32W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Joyce Perez
1W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.29
3.5
Deborah DiNoto
2W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.