← Teams

CGM-Nguyen/Jarvis

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.86 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Kevin Jarvis
published 4.5
3.82
Nick Hooker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
—
Ted Rose
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.44
Clark Cosart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
—
Greg Culver
usually #3 Doubles 69%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published 3.5
3.25
Michael Jansen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Murray Jansen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Albert Hensley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results6 ties
2021-05-09Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMurray Jansen / Michael Jansen vs Jonathan Hong / Edwin Janes6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlbert Hensley / Tony Kalil vs Tony Wirth / Frank Shen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-04-25Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesMurray Jansen / Michael Jansen vs Christian Casebeer / Kit Johnson6-1, 7-6
2021-04-18Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesMurray Jansen / Michael Jansen vs Brad Ouderkirk / David Vant Hof6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTony Kalil / Nick Hooker vs Chris Collins / David Greenberg6-4, 6-3
2021-04-11Lost 0–2
L#2 SinglesTed Rose vs David Mittelstadt6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesGreg Culver / Nick Hooker vs Gregg Palmer / Honorato Wenceslao6-2, 6-1
2021-03-28Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesMurray Jansen / Michael Jansen vs Teddy Messan / AC Nguyen6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTed Rose vs Huan Tran6-3, 6-2
2021-03-21Won 2–1
W#2 DoublesClark Cosart / Jae Joon Kang vs Brian Jones / Patrick Herbst6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesTed Rose vs Todd Eckelman6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlbert Hensley / Greg Culver vs James Ringelberg / Christopher Graham7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Kevin Jarvis
31W–3L career
not enough data
—
4
Nick Hooker
194W–65L career
0%98%2%
3.82
4
Ted Rose
7W–2L career
not enough data
—
4
Clark Cosart
61W–38L career
51%49%0%
3.44
3.5
Greg Culver
51W–25L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Michael Jansen
27W–55L career
2%97%1%
3.25
3.5
Murray Jansen
38W–63L career
1%98%1%
3.25
0
Albert Hensley
29W–44L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.