Teams

6-TStefan-HS

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-05-04Won 10
W#1 SinglesTynita Edwards vs Leslie Jackson6-4, 6-4
2022-04-20vs 11-KMcWhorter-HVCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathy Holt / Becky Payne vs Fiona Lundblad / Kensy Ryan1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTynita Edwards vs Rhiannon Ludington7-6, 6-3
2022-04-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTammy Hood / Kathy Holt vs Lindsey Carpenter / Stephanie Ross4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-04-13vs 10-AKlein-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesTynita Edwards / Tammy Hood vs Stacy Price / Julie DeConto6-4, 6-3
2022-04-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesTynita Edwards / Kathy Holt vs Gabriela Stefan / Yvonne Ricci7-5, 6-2
2022-04-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesTynita Edwards vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-01vs 5-AJarvis-CHTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathy Holt / Becky Payne vs Jessica Alzamora / Lisa Baxter3-6, 2-6
2022-03-30Won 10
W#1 SinglesTammy Hood vs Ashley Perry6-2, 6-3
2022-03-02vs 4-NWatts-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathy Holt / Becky Payne vs Brianna Nunez / Veda Gilbert6-1, 6-2
2022-02-23vs 7-ACombs-CCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesTynita Edwards / Tammy Hood vs Barbara Do Greene / Teresa Ritter6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Tracy Stefan
published
2.71
Melissa Provost
published
2.70
Deborah Brown
published 3
2.65
Tammy Hood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Tynita Edwards
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Desiree Korelich
published 2.5
2.49
Kathy Holt
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.25
Linda Naden
published
Jennifer Draughon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Provost + Kathy Holt1443% games−3.4% vs expected
Tammy Hood + Tynita Edwards5170% gamesnot enough data
Linda Naden + Desiree Korelich134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Stefan
25W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
Melissa Provost
9W–25L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Deborah Brown
14W–15L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Tammy Hood
66W–105L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Tynita Edwards
100W–92L career · 6 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
2.64
2.5
Desiree Korelich
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
0%40%60%
2.53
3
Kathy Holt
25W–63L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.49
Linda Naden
4W–19L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
2.25
Jennifer Draughon
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.