Teams

Manlius Y

2025 Tri Level Men · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.20 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-06vs JangLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Green / Ben Weiss vs Craig Nicholls / Mizuho Okada1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Umina / Corey Wilcox vs Steve Brandt / Ben Jung1-6, 2-6
2025-03-30vs DrumlinsWon 21
W#1 DoublesFenghua Li / Lawrence Martin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMike Heinz / Richard Ingraham vs Joe Fantacone / Aaron Schiffrik6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDana Cartwright / JP Sabourin vs Jeremy Mauro / Philip Smith4-6, 6-7
2025-03-23vs SYR: SFTC - WallensteinLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Green / Lawrence Martin vs Jonathan Dee / David Fernando3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Harvey / Mike Heinz vs Zunli Lu / Kyle Voyer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDana Cartwright / Thomas Umina vs Jeffrey Friedman / Stephen Nesspor3-6, 1-6
2025-03-16vs JangLost 02
L#2 DoublesMatthew Harvey / Richard Ingraham vs Michael Leopold / Marcus Smolka0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJP Sabourin / Thomas Umina vs Steve Brandt / Richard Price6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-09vs DrumlinsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Green / Lawrence Martin vs Patrick Brown / Peter Greetham7-6, 3-2
W#2 DoublesJon Najarian / Ben Weiss vs John Garrett / Jay Lee6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJP Sabourin / Thomas Umina vs Jeremy Mauro / Philip Smith7-5, 6-0
2025-03-02vs SYR: SFTC - WallensteinLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Green / Lawrence Martin vs Robert Auler / Shay Smyth3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDan Ferguson / Mike Heinz vs Jesse Daino / Jonathan Pollock4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDana Cartwright / Corey Wilcox vs Charles Durr / Stephen Nesspor2-6, 2-6
2025-02-23vs Eastern/Bradley/4.5M Tri LevelWon 21
L#1 DoublesFenghua Li / Richard Ingraham vs Kurran Singh / Craig Nicholls3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Harvey / Wei Lee vs Marc Hann / Ben Jung6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJP Sabourin / Thomas Umina vs Steve Brandt / Richard Price6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-02-16vs DrumlinsLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Green / Ben Weiss vs Richard Hartwell / Karl Offen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJon Najarian / Matthew Harvey vs Peter Greetham / Joe Fantacone3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDana Cartwright / Corey Wilcox vs Roger Hubeli / Jeremy Mauro3-6, 3-6
2025-02-02vs Bradley TriSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWei Lee / Fenghua Li vs Jackson Bradley / David Fernando2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJP Sabourin / Thomas Umina vs Danilo Fernando / Stephen Nesspor6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SYR: SFTC - Wallenstein8119821193
2Jang6319817185
3Manlius Y36101738275
4Drumlins1862143305

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Lawrence Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Richard Ingraham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Fenghua Li
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Mike Heinz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Michael Green
published
3.30
Wei Lee
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Ben Weiss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Thomas Umina
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Matthew Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Dana Cartwright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Corey Wilcox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dan Ferguson
published 3
JP Sabourin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jon Najarian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Heinz + Dan Ferguson1438% games+1.6% vs expected
Ben Weiss + Michael Green3543% games+1.1% vs expected
Fenghua Li + Wei Lee5346% games−20.1% vs expected
Dana Cartwright + Thomas Umina1436% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Harvey + Mike Heinz224 matchesnot enough data
Richard Ingraham + Wei Lee224 matchesnot enough data
JP Sabourin + Thomas Umina314 matchesnot enough data
Dana Cartwright + JP Sabourin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lawrence Martin
10W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
3.5
Richard Ingraham
134W–40L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
Fenghua Li
63W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Mike Heinz
12W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
Michael Green
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Wei Lee
26W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Ben Weiss
22W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Thomas Umina
13W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Matthew Harvey
21W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
3
Dana Cartwright
20W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Corey Wilcox
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dan Ferguson
9W–26L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
JP Sabourin
18W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jon Najarian
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.