Teams

BCC RED

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-04vs CVTA TEALWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Astley / Jay Sonnenberg vs Steve Harford / Joshua Dirksen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-08-21vs TTA GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Astley / Jay Sonnenberg vs Robert Angel / Caleb Fahrner1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-14vs BTA-IBM YELLOWLost 01
L#2 DoublesWill Day / Justin Astley vs Chris Decicco / Jordan Stauder5-7, 3-6
2024-07-31vs CVTA TEALWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Astley / William Kramer vs Joshua Dirksen / Robert Tawa6-2, 6-2
2024-07-24vs BRMST GREENWon 20
W#1 SinglesPete Nichols vs Sean Coppom6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJay Sonnenberg / David Kinney vs John Shaw / Christian Schulz7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Tom Romine
published
3.92
Pete Nichols
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.91
Matthew Klein
published
3.87
Brian Waters
published 4
3.79
William Kramer
published
3.78
Justin Astley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Andrew Morley
published 4
Chris Scordo
published 4
3.74
Eric Loof
published
3.71
Jay Sonnenberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Will Day
published
3.64
David Kinney
published 4
Russell Merlin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pete Nichols + Eric Loof7261% games+6.9% vs expected
Justin Astley + Jay Sonnenberg10653% games+1.2% vs expected
William Kramer + Justin Astley3451% games−1.7% vs expected
Jay Sonnenberg + Brian Waters4258% games−2.5% vs expected
Pete Nichols + Jay Sonnenberg314 matchesnot enough data
William Kramer + Pete Nichols213 matchesnot enough data
William Kramer + Chris Scordo303 matchesnot enough data
Will Day + Brian Waters123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Romine
15W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.93
4
Pete Nichols
33W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.92
Matthew Klein
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.91
4
Brian Waters
18W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.87
William Kramer
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Justin Astley
38W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Andrew Morley
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Chris Scordo
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Eric Loof
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Jay Sonnenberg
67W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Will Day
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
4
David Kinney
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
Russell Merlin
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.