Teams

Sykes, Joanna

2023 Tri-Level 18 & Over-JXN · Women 3.5, 3.0, 2.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Jamie Page
published 3.5
3.27
Joanna Sykes
published
3.21
Nealie Cooper
published
3.07
Kimberly Wooten
published
2.96
Rhonda Hamilton
published
2.87
Amber Varner
published 3
2.84
Audrey Page
published 3
Brittany Wade
published 3
2.08
Tedi Kennedy
published
Joycelynn Cooper
published
Kelli Payne
published
Melanie McLeod
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nealie Cooper + Audrey Page5352% games+4.2% vs expected
Joanna Sykes + Kimberly Wooten4848% games+0.8% vs expected
Nealie Cooper + Joanna Sykes4453% games−0.6% vs expected
Joanna Sykes + Joycelynn Cooper2348% games−3.1% vs expected
Nealie Cooper + Kimberly Wooten224 matchesnot enough data
Nealie Cooper + Brittany Wade213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jamie Page
50W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
Joanna Sykes
34W–37L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Nealie Cooper
27W–22L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Kimberly Wooten
21W–38L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Rhonda Hamilton
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Amber Varner
23W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Audrey Page
16W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Brittany Wade
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tedi Kennedy
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Joycelynn Cooper
31W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelli Payne
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melanie McLeod
41W–24L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.