Teams

SD LLW 8.0 El Toyon/ Aquino-Ong

2021 Mixed Doubles 40 & Over Spring - SD · SD - 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-22vs SD 8.0 ECCTA/ HwangSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJada Cade / Jed Galan vs Priscilla Martinez / Jeffrey Bertolini6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSherr Aquino / Eric Shanks vs Katerina Govoni / Andrew MacFarlane1-6, 3-6
2021-05-15vs SD 8.0 Mtn View/ Ferrero-SafaWon 10
W#1 DoublesNorman Granger / Yuli Reams vs Lizette Ferrero / Jose Samperio6-3, 1-1
2021-05-01vs SD 8.0 Mtn View/ Bauer- PillowWon 20
W#2 DoublesJed Galan / Jada Cade vs Tim Pillow / Paulina Rassavong6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNorman Granger / Yuli Reams vs Grace Friebe / Jason Hom6-3, 6-1
2021-04-24vs SD 8.0 Mtn View/ WagnerWon 10
W#3 DoublesJada Cade / Eric Shanks vs Bea McLellan / Ray San Miguel6-3, 6-3
2021-04-17vs SD 8.0 ECCTA/ HwangWon 10
W#1 DoublesJed Galan / Jada Cade vs Priscilla Martinez / Stephen Aiken7-5, 6-2
2021-04-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Neri / Yuli Reams vs Alexandra Safa / Pablo de la Lama6-1, 6-1
2021-04-03vs SD 8.0 Mtn View/ WagnerWon 10
W#2 DoublesNorman Granger / Yuli Reams vs Tom Wagner / Bea McLellan6-0, 6-2
2021-03-27vs SD 8.0 Mtn View/ Bauer- PillowWon 10
W#2 DoublesSherr Aquino / Jed Galan vs Grace Friebe / Jason Hom6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Jada Cade
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.09
Guadalupe Rendon
published 4.5
4.02
Sherr Aquino
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.98
Yuli Reams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.87
Jed Galan
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.57
Joan Yngson
published
3.54
Eric Shanks
published 4
3.23
Margaret Hudson
published
Norman Granger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jed Galan + Sherr Aquino2451% gamesnot enough data
Jed Galan + Jada Cade5066% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jada Cade
131W–55L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%78%21%
4.40
4.5
Guadalupe Rendon
13W–10L career · no lines in 2021
24%75%<1%
4.09
4
Sherr Aquino
101W–98L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Yuli Reams
119W–54L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
3.98
4
Jed Galan
161W–84L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
3.87
Joan Yngson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Eric Shanks
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.54
Margaret Ann Mansell
12W–10L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Margaret Hudson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Norman Granger
11W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.