Teams

Highland - Mattox

2022 B'ham Tri-Level Weekday - 40 & Over Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women - Tuesday

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women - Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Kirstie Ivey
published
3.90
Mallie Whatley
published
3.89
Whitney Reidinger
published
3.83
Beth Shea
published 4
3.46
April Wittmann
published 4
3.43
Marcy Jolly
published
3.39
Selina Maddox
published
3.28
Aimee Sims
published 3.5
3.18
Charlyne Mattox
published 3.5
3.09
Jane Haines
published
3.04
Jacquelyn Taylor
published 3.5
2.92
Ruth Berry
published
2.76
Tamara Cusmariu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcy Jolly + Selina Maddox321956% games+2.0% vs expected
Mallie Whatley + Whitney Reidinger123 matchesnot enough data
Whitney Reidinger + Kirstie Ivey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirstie Ivey
89W–54L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.93
Mallie Whatley
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
Whitney Reidinger
49W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Beth Shea
18W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
April Wittmann
17W–47L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
Marcy Jolly
70W–36L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
Selina Maddox
51W–38L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Aimee Sims
23W–50L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Charlyne Mattox
22W–27L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Jane Haines
29W–29L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Jacquelyn Taylor
27W–23L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Ruth Berry
17W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Tamara Cusmariu
13W–15L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.