Teams

LJDoyle/CSD 55s

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 55 & Over · Men 7.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-10vs LTWaber/Pen 55+7.5 MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Bachner / Robert Bunting vs Douglas Linton / James Borders6-2, 6-0
2022-09-26Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJames Doyle / Tad Sargent vs Pradeep Kumar / Pasquale Avella1-6, 4-6
2022-09-19vs LTWaber/Pen 55+7.5 MonLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Bachner / David Miller vs Alan Rummelsburg / Clarence Bush4-6, 2-6
2022-09-18vs LWHI-Hirata/PACSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRobert Bachner / Tad Sargent vs George Harris / Jeff Lloyd6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJames Doyle / Michael Dunn vs Rolfe Schnur / Pasquale Avella3-6, 4-6
2022-09-12vs LMRO-Robson/LNTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Bachner / Tad Sargent vs Bo Wheeler / Norm Marttila4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-08-29vs LTWaber/Pen 55+7.5 MonWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Bachner / Kalpathi Subramanian vs Bill Moore / Walter Hubbard5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJames Doyle / David Miller vs Tom Waber / Mike Elliott6-2, 6-3
2022-08-23vs LWHI-Hirata/PACLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Doyle / Kalpathi Subramanian vs Pradeep Kumar / Jordan Shields1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Robert Bachner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.34
James Doyle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.33
Tad Sargent
published
3.31
Paul Frey
published
3.16
Jeffrey Hornock
published 3.5
3.16
3.08
Robert Bunting
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Doyle + Robert Bachner1637% games−13.2% vs expected
Robert Bachner + Jeffrey Hornock314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Robert Bachner
109W–185L career · 5 lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
3.41
4
James Doyle
29W–81L career · 4 lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.34
Tad Sargent
11W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Paul Frey
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
3.31
3.5
Jeffrey Hornock
33W–39L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Kalpathi Subramanian
0W–7L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.16
Robert Bunting
5W–18L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.