Teams

Craig/Kruse- Net Hounds

2022 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 3.5 MEN

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-06Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAshish Kumar Singh / Jin Chang vs Timothy Battersby / Andrew Miskella4-6, 2-6
2021-11-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesJin Chang / Amin Firoozmand vs Dan Lundgren / Bob Christiansen6-1, 6-3
2021-11-01vs Parker- Baseline AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesDamian Langsweirdt / Jin Chang vs Kurtis Fechtmeyer / Angelo Lenarduzzi6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-10-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJin Chang / Jeff Craig vs Joseph Ryan / Alex Gustafson6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2021-10-11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJin Chang / Damian Langsweirdt vs Brad Charan / Douglas Valley6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2021-10-04vs Fermstad- Djoko GOATsLost 01
L#3 DoublesJin Chang / Arkady Shemyakin vs Luis Laguna / Benji Mathews3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Jon Kruse
published
3.38
Jordi Martin Cossio
published
3.31
Jeff Craig
published
3.31
Cody Zwiefelhofer
published 3.5
3.29
Jin Chang
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.27
Scott Simpson
published
3.23
Chuck Tatsuda
published 3.5
3.20
Joshua Sillers
published
3.17
Thomas Godfrey
published
3.14
Arkady Shemyakin
published 3.5
3.13
Damian Langsweirdt
published 3.5
Matt Woelfel
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jon Kruse
37W–38L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Jordi Martin Cossio
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
Jeff Craig
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Cody Zwiefelhofer
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Jin Chang
134W–139L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Scott Simpson
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Chuck Tatsuda
18W–35L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Joshua Sillers
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Thomas Godfrey
28W–36L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Arkady Shemyakin
12W–36L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Damian Langsweirdt
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Matt Woelfel
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.