Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Lutz

2022 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 3.5M

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-17vs Sports Mall-DuranSplit 11
W#2 Male DoublesKeith Gwilliam / Tyler Olsen vs Joshua Ruder / Marty Taylor6-4, 6-3
L#3 Male DoublesTodd Zaitzeff / Sergio Farfan-Cardenete vs Massimo Moser / Matthew Wilkin7-6, 4-5
2022-12-10vs Sports Mall-SatoLost 01
L#2 Male DoublesTodd Zaitzeff / Nicholas Shaffer vs Jon Nielson / Matt Logan2-6, 2-6
2022-12-03vs Sports Mall-LudlowSplit 11
L#2 Male DoublesTerry Lutz / Rick Callister vs David Ludlow / Peter Fisher3-6, 3-6
W#3 Male DoublesTodd Zaitzeff / Nicholas Shaffer vs Scott Overman / Tim Kjar6-1, 6-0
2022-11-19vs Sunpro-TaylorLost 01
L#2 Male DoublesTyler Olsen / Rick Callister vs Chad Clifford / David McGill5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-11-12vs Liberty Park Tennis-Olsen/ThomasLost 01
L#3 Male DoublesJoseph Bush / Todd Zaitzeff vs Ryan Zabriskie / Aaron Stobbe2-6, 3-6
W#1 Male DoublesTerry Lutz / Keith Gwilliam vs Jeff Rossi / Tam Vu1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 Male DoublesTodd Zaitzeff / Nicholas Shaffer vs Alex Robinson / Zach Robinson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Keith Gwilliam
usually #1 Male Doubles 50%, also #2 Male Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Todd Zaitzeff
usually #3 Male Doubles 60%, also #2 Male Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Terry Lutz
published
3.13
Nicholas Shaffer
published
3.01
Joseph Bush
published
3.00
Rick Callister
usually #2 Male Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Philipp Schroeder
published
Tyler Olsen
published
Tyson Lutz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Bush + Keith Gwilliam4653% games+11.1% vs expected
Terry Lutz + Keith Gwilliam5255% games+8.2% vs expected
Terry Lutz + Rick Callister2645% games+4.9% vs expected
Terry Lutz + Todd Zaitzeff1445% games+3.3% vs expected
Philipp Schroeder + Tyler Olsen2448% games+1.9% vs expected
Terry Lutz + Joseph Bush2541% games−6.6% vs expected
Tyson Lutz + Terry Lutz5058% gamesnot enough data
Rick Callister + Todd Zaitzeff2343% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Keith Gwilliam
167W–127L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Todd Zaitzeff
57W–57L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Terry Lutz
67W–84L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Nicholas Shaffer
44W–55L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
Joseph Bush
56W–58L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Rick Callister
24W–29L career · 2 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
Philipp Schroeder
26W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sergio Farfan-Cardenete
27W–31L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tyler Olsen
6W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tyson Lutz
16W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.