Teams

Alachua/Hovde/3.5/3.0/2.5W

2025 Alachua Trilevel 18 & Over · Alachua Trilevel 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.28 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-01vs 300 Team KingWon 20
W#1 DoublesCandis Aurora Wiggins / Jamie Gilliam vs Christine Engels / Helen Ingmarsson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBailey Lerner / Ann Redfern vs Charlene Krueger / Raksha Ramkissoon6-0, 6-0
2025-02-21vs 300 Tri Deez Lil NetzLost 02
L#1 DoublesTania Alavi / Elizabeth Howell vs Amber Muehlmann / Tiffany Scalf3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRachael van Dyke / Danielle McGriff vs Sarah Hooghuis / Heather Mears3-6, 3-6
2025-02-15vs 300 Team KingWon 20
W#1 DoublesCandis Aurora Wiggins / Tania Alavi vs Christa Arnold / Christine Engels6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlison Safir / Ann Redfern vs Alex Henry / Charlene Krueger6-1, 6-1
2025-02-01vs WS WestsidersWon 20
W#1 DoublesTania Alavi / Cynthia Lewis vs Angie Gomez / Sophie Marcoux7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Holliday / Ann Redfern vs Stephanie Portillo / Terry Rodriguez7-5, 6-3
2025-01-31vs 300 Tri Deez Lil NetzLost 01
L#2 DoublesDanielle McGriff / Rachael van Dyke vs Sarah Hooghuis / Jhanna Gilbert2-6, 0-6
2025-01-24vs WS WestsidersWon 10
W#2 DoublesDanielle McGriff / Maureen Ratliff vs Heather Jewell / Stephanie Portillo6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Alachua Trilevel 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Mara Rodriguez
published
3.29
Tania Alavi
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Howell
published 3.5
3.19
Hebah Fox
published 3.5
3.14
Cynthia Lewis
published 3.5
3.13
Lauren Holliday
published
3.09
Candis Aurora Wiggins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Alison Safir
published 3
2.90
Ann Redfern
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Bailey Lerner
published 3
2.68
Danielle McGriff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Kelly Nash
published
2.34
Susan Hammond
published
2.26
Sheena Jones
published
2.14
Majken Hoh
published
Mandi Stephenson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candis Aurora Wiggins + Tania Alavi9361% gamesnot enough data
Sheena Jones + Susan Hammond044 matchesnot enough data
Danielle McGriff + Sheena Jones123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mara Rodriguez
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.50
3.5
Tania Alavi
140W–84L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Elizabeth Howell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Hebah Fox
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cynthia Lewis
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Lauren Holliday
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.13
3.5
Candis Aurora Wiggins
49W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Alison Safir
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Ann Redfern
41W–36L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Bailey Lerner
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Danielle McGriff
72W–83L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
2.68
Kelly Nash
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Susan Hammond
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.34
Sheena Jones
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
Majken Hoh
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Mandi Stephenson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.