Teams

Julich

2022 18&Over Mixed Manhattan · 10.0 Mixed

19 players · average NTRP 4.86 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-10vs LiebWon 10
W#1 DoublesRia Gerger / Loic Minery vs Manuel Barroetavena / Katie Figgie6-4, 6-3
2022-03-27vs Eastern/Padilla/18&Over10.0XDWon 30
W#1 DoublesLoic Minery / Ria Gerger vs Marnie Perez Ochoa / Gustavo Loza Padilla6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMatt Hansen / Jennifer Fridman vs Borja Zarco / Crissianne Kintanar6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAdam Gerger / Nicole Kalhorn vs MARTIN MARTINICKY / Lara Rakocevic6-2, 6-0
2022-03-21vs LiebWon 21
W#1 DoublesRia Gerger / Loic Minery vs Christian Perez / Elise Woulfe6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Fridman / Matt Hansen vs Manuel Barroetavena / Katie Figgie6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAdam Joyce / Ashley Lessen vs Samantha Lieb / Andrew Herring2-6, 1-6
2022-03-05vs Eastern/Padilla/18&Over10.0XDLost 12
L#1 DoublesClayton Alenik / Ashley Lessen vs Ernesto Ramos Prom / Marnie Perez Ochoa4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLoic Minery / Ria Gerger vs Alejandra V Gil / Gustavo Loza Padilla6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAdam Gerger / Jennifer Fridman vs Deanna Bailey / Rene Ramos Israde1-6, 3-6
2022-02-23vs LiebLost 03
L#1 DoublesBen Shapiro / Ria Gerger vs Samuel Geier / Katie Figgie4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMohammad El-Haj Ahmad / Sarah Bowen vs Andrew Herring / Samantha Lieb5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEric Tomasini / Ashley Lessen vs Wesley Maddox / Courtney Geiss5-7, 4-6
2022-02-11vs Eastern/Padilla/18&Over10.0XDLost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Lessen / Clayton Alenik vs Marnie Perez Ochoa / Ernesto Ramos Prom3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Bowen / Ben Shapiro vs Gustavo Loza Padilla / Lara Rakocevic5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRia Gerger / Jeffrey Lawrence vs Borja Zarco / Shelby Lau6-2, 6-0
2022-01-13vs Eastern/Padilla/18&Over10.0XDWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Bowen / Loic Minery vs Deanna Bailey / Gustavo Loza Padilla6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElena Blanina / Eric Tomasini vs Lara Rakocevic / MARTIN MARTINICKY6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAdam Joyce / Carolina Torres vs Jasmine Carrothers / Borja Zarco6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 10.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Julich08141022198
2Eastern/Padilla/18&Over10.0XD08131126214
3Lieb0891530226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.77
Carolina Torres
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
Ben Shapiro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
Daniel Chang
published 5
Elena Blanina
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.73
Mohammad El-Haj Ahmad
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.63
Eric Tomasini
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.61
Sarah Bowen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Adam Gerger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Lucila Herrera Parkinson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.06
Ashley Lessen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Adam Joyce
published
Jennifer Fridman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lauren Louks
published
Loic Minery
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
Matt Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nicole Johnston
published
Nicole Kalhorn
published
Ria Gerger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Sarah Huah
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ria Gerger + Matt Hansen1451% gamesnot enough data
Loic Minery + Ria Gerger404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Carolina Torres
64W–13L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
4.77
5
Ben Shapiro
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
5
Daniel Chang
7W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
5
Elena Blanina
8W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Mohammad El-Haj Ahmad
53W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.73
5
Eric Tomasini
74W–49L career · 6 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.63
Sarah Bowen
52W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
4.61
4.5
Adam Gerger
21W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lucila Herrera Parkinson
19W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
Ashley Lessen
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
4.06
Adam Joyce
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Fridman
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lauren Louks
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Loic Minery
41W–3L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data
Matt Hansen
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicole Johnston
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicole Kalhorn
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ria Gerger
29W–15L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Huah
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.