Teams

He.Suke18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-29vs An.Acharya18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesAshley Randall vs Meghan Campbell6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesGeri Russell vs Anuja Acharya6-0, 5-0
W#3 SinglesHeidi Suke vs Cristina Baker6-2, 6-1
2025-07-14vs Ja.Stephan18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesCaroline Williams Aden vs Elizabeth Vieira3-6, 0-6
2025-07-07vs Au.Beam18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesCaroline Williams Aden vs Christina Hyde6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-06-30Won 10
W#3 SinglesCaroline Williams Aden vs Susan Gentry6-1, 6-3
2025-06-16vs Me.McCaskill18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesAshley Whited vs Sarah Sims Chesson6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesGeri Russell vs Meredith McCaskill7-5, 6-3
2025-06-09vs Me.Dougher18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesHaley Davies vs Amy Willard6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAshley Randall vs Amy Whitaker6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesGeri Russell vs Caroline Dougherty6-0, 6-1
2025-06-02vs De.Farmer18S2.5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCaroline Williams Aden vs Latoya Clay3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Ashley Randall
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.70
Kathryn Hamrick
published
2.61
Ashley Whited
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.58
Geri Russell
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.54
Haley Davies
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.48
Caroline Williams Aden
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.47
Heidi Suke
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.04
Devany Ayers
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Whited + Kathryn Hamrick303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashley Randall
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
Kathryn Hamrick
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Ashley Whited
8W–6L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Geri Russell
19W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%28%72%
2.58
Haley Davies
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Caroline Williams Aden
22W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%54%46%
2.48
Heidi Suke
13W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
0%58%42%
2.47
2.5
Devany Ayers
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.