Teams

Leon - Britt

2022 Leon TriLevel 18 & Over · 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-22vs ProppLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Winegardner / Julie Espy vs Irene Ellis / Karen de Cardenas4-6, 4-6
2022-10-15vs ProppWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Britt / Michelle de la Valdene vs Rhonda Tullos / Kim Thriffiley6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Winegardner / Nancy Donahue vs Karen de Cardenas / Irene Ellis7-6, 7-5
2022-10-08vs ProppSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJulie Espy / Elizabeth Murray vs Brenda Jahn / Gina Herring6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMariann Sabolic / Catherine Cooper vs Catherine McRae / Olivia McCaffery4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-10-01vs ProppWon 20
W#2 DoublesNancy Donahue / Jennifer Winegardner vs Gina Herring / Irene Ellis5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBecky Bush / Catherine Cooper vs Catherine McRae / Olivia McCaffery6-0, 7-5
2022-09-24vs ProppLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Britt / Lisa Franson vs Jennifer Kjellerup / Kim Thriffiley7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Espy / Elizabeth Murray vs Tracy Propp / Karen de Cardenas3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Cooper / Deborah Beers vs Olivia McCaffery / Sally Davis3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-09-21vs ProppLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Winegardner / Julie Espy vs Brenda Jahn / Karen de Cardenas2-6, 1-6
2022-09-17vs ProppWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Britt / Mary Warner vs Tracy Propp / Amy Otis6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Elizabeth Murray
published 4
3.71
Jennifer Britt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Lisa Franson
published
3.52
Jennifer Winegardner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Nancy Donahue
published
3.30
Julie Espy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Becky Bush
published 3.5
3.22
Catherine Cooper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Mariann Sabolic
published
3.13
Deborah Beers
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Cooper + Julie Espy13953% games+2.9% vs expected
Jennifer Winegardner + Becky Bush9743% games−3.5% vs expected
Lisa Franson + Elizabeth Murray033 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Winegardner + Julie Espy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Murray
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Jennifer Britt
111W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Lisa Franson
31W–24L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Jennifer Winegardner
195W–211L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.52
Nancy Donahue
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Julie Espy
146W–128L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Becky Bush
33W–33L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Catherine Cooper
128W–131L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Mariann Sabolic
2W–12L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Deborah Beers
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.