Teams

Johnson/18&O/3.0/MD/RPAR

2026 Ruston Mixed 18 & Over · 3.0 Ruston (18&O) Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-27vs Sanderson/18&O/3.0/MD/RPARSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJessica Johnson / Lane Odom vs Tiphanie Maxwell / Johnson Sadiq2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEmma Bowman / Taylor Pyles vs Tina Otwell / Keith Sternitzky6-4, 6-3
2026-07-20vs Sanderson/18&O/3.0/MD/RPARLost 12
L#1 DoublesIvan Zhelman / Shelby Daum vs Johnson Sadiq / Tina Otwell0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrandy Roberson / Lane Odom vs Sarah Keyes Jeffords / Jeffery Powell6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEmma Bowman / Taylor Pyles vs Jennifer Sanderson / Jake Gilmore5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-07-13vs Sanderson/18&O/3.0/MD/RPARWon 20
W#1 DoublesEmma Bowman / Taylor Pyles vs Keith Sternitzky / Tina Otwell2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIvan Zhelman / Shelby Daum vs Stefanie Simpson / Jake Gilmore6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-29vs Sanderson/18&O/3.0/MD/RPARLost 02
L#1 DoublesTaylor Pyles / Brandy Roberson vs Johnson Sadiq / Tina Otwell5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJackson Matthews / Emma Bowman vs Sarah Keyes Jeffords / Jeffery Powell7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-22vs Sanderson/18&O/3.0/MD/RPARLost 12
W#1 DoublesIvan Zhelman / Jessica Johnson vs Jennifer Sanderson / Keith Sternitzky6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesEmma Bowman / Taylor Pyles vs Johnson Sadiq / Sarah Keyes Jeffords7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJackson Matthews / Brandy Roberson vs Jake Gilmore / Stefanie Simpson1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Ruston (18&O) Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sanderson/18&O/3.0/MD/RPAR419616121
2Johnson/18&O/3.0/MD/RPAR146920146

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Ivan Zhelman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Emma Bowman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.78
Brandy Roberson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jessica Johnson
published 3
2.57
Shelby Daum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jackson Matthews
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lane Odom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Taylor Pyles
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Pyles + Emma Bowman2349% gamesnot enough data
Jackson Matthews + Brandy Roberson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ivan Zhelman
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Emma Bowman
8W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Brandy Roberson
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Jessica Johnson
no matches on record · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Shelby Daum
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
Jackson Matthews
0W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lane Odom
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Pyles
6W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.