Teams

CKelly (Charlotte CC)

2024 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-13vs TEaster (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEmily Tindel / Frances Hyde vs Natalija Vanesse / Monica Larios5-7, 3-6
2024-04-29vs TMiller (Park Road)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesEmily Tindel vs Janelle Sonmor2-6, 0-6
2024-04-15vs VWade (Springfield)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNancy Lowry / Emily Tindel vs Krista Stewart / Erica Turkus1-6, 4-6
2024-04-08vs MWalters (Carmel)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesEmily Tindel vs Stefania Faraj1-6, 0-6
2024-04-01vs NStewart/SParker (Carmel)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEmily Tindel / Kathryn Thigpen vs Stephanie Parker / Brittany Russell4-6, 2-6
2024-03-11vs RSmith/KBissett (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesEmily Tindel vs Jenny Wilken0-6, 1-6
2024-03-04vs KJohnson (Sardis)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesEmily Tindel vs Kimberly Battle1-6, 0-6
2024-02-26vs LOBryan (WSRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Tindel / Catherine Ruth Kelly vs Deidre Miesse / Jen Shelley6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-02-19vs SStroud (Sardis)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesEmily Tindel vs Laura Warden7-6, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Elizabeth Jack
published
2.85
2.69
Emily Tindel
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.56
Kathryn Thigpen
published
2.54
Kerry Baldwin
published
2.49
Stacy Beard
published
2.43
Nancy Lowry
published
Frances Hyde
published
Lindsay Griffin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Ruth Kelly + Emily Tindel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Jack
6W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Catherine Ruth Kelly
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Emily Tindel
32W–64L career · 9 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
2.69
Kathryn Thigpen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
2.56
Kerry Baldwin
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
2.54
Stacy Beard
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.49
Nancy Lowry
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.43
Frances Hyde
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lindsay Griffin
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.