Teams

Spearman 8.0 - Woodlands Parks

2023 NOHO MIXED DOUBLES 40 & Over · 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-20vs Alvarado-KCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaurie Capra / Thomas Rapson vs Donna Ullrich / Justin Endicott6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaurie Capra / Chad Harris vs Brian Crawford / Jennifer Breckon6-1, 6-0
2023-07-09vs Simms-Smart Aces-Woodlands ParksWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaurie Capra / Chad Harris vs Carrie Simms / Brian Mourino6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesThomas Rapson / Laurie Capra vs Sheri Brown / Brandt Dozier6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Laurie Capra
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.16
Katy Harris
published
3.94
Kelli Ross
published
3.89
Mike Caldarella
published
3.89
MICHAEL SPEARMAN
published
3.80
Chad Harris
published 4.5
3.34
Dyana Spearman
published 3.5
3.31
Thomas Rapson
published
Katarina Rutherford
published
Margaret Wolford
published
Meredith Williams
published
Myer Ellison
published
Paul Raiford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Harris + Katy Harris6167% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Laurie Capra
25W–8L career · type M · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
Katy Harris
56W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
4.16
Kelli Ross
59W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%32%
3.94
Mike Caldarella
41W–40L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.89
MICHAEL SPEARMAN
27W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.89
4.5
Chad Harris
19W–12L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
3.80
3.5
Dyana Spearman
13W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
Thomas Rapson
10W–19L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
3.31
Katarina Rutherford
15W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Margaret Wolford
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meredith Williams
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Myer Ellison
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paul Raiford
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.