Teams

NWO 18&Over 2.5W Seifried-Inverness

2024 NWO Adult 18 & Over Night · NWO Adult 18 & Over 2.5 W Night

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesMary Mahoney / Jennifer Seifried vs Rachel Root / Rebecca Seigley2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKassidy Bishop / Julie Lee vs Nasiba Mian / Brianna Johnson0-6, 1-6
2024-07-23vs NWO 18&Over 2.5W Matt -BedfordWon 20
W#1 DoublesRyan Miller / Dorianne Cox vs Erica Kerper / KELLY OVERFIELD6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKassidy Bishop / Mary Mahoney vs Myint Myint Khine / Lola Massenberg6-1, 6-3
2024-07-17vs NWO 18&Over 2.5W Morgan/Pletz-SCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshley Sheehan / Kimberly Grimm vs Maura DeMilt / Jennifer Shimborske6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMonica Peterson vs Adrianne Milano6-1, 6-2
2024-07-10vs NWO 18&Over 2.5W Trish -PTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesDorianne Cox / Jennifer Seifried vs Rhonda Aguiton / Barbara Meyers6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKassidy Bishop vs Kelly Sandberg2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Lee / Hannah Farley vs Joanna Woodmancy / Jessica Carpenter6-2, 7-5
2024-06-19vs NWO 18&Over 2.5W Brown-FTWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Seifried / Ashley Sheehan vs Stacey Brown / Tricia Carrero6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKimberly Grimm vs Dawn Bentley6-0, 6-2
2024-06-12vs NWO 18&Over 2.5W Williams -PTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Sheehan / Amanda Viviano vs Andrea Born / Keri Marsh7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHannah Farley vs Jennifer ONeil6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDorianne Cox / Mary Mahoney vs Caroline Hoffmann / Jennifer Merz6-0, 6-1
2024-06-05vs NWO 18&Over 2.5W Amanda -PTCLost 02
L#1 SinglesMonica Peterson vs Lauren Workman3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDorianne Cox / Kassidy Bishop vs Gina Skolmowski / Bonita Murphy7-6, 3-5, 0-1
W#1 DoublesAshley Sheehan / Amanda Viviano vs Dorthelia Smith / Tiffany Sullivan6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAmrita Amato vs Rhiannon Byrd7-5
W#2 DoublesJennifer Seifried / Hannah Farley vs Karlene Langford / Lena Brank6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesJennifer Seifried / Dorianne Cox vs Anais Klopping / Samantha Didion6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMonica Peterson vs Annie Babkiewicz6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRyan Miller / Kimberly Grimm vs Allison Murawski / Rachel McCarthy7-5, 6-2
L#1 DoublesAshley Sheehan / Amanda Viviano vs Heather Stachowiak / Jennifer Carter2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKassidy Bishop / Julie Lee vs Jennifer Huntzinger / Marina Nassar4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · NWO Adult 18 & Over 2.5 W Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWO 18&Over 2.5W Kielhorn/Stachowiak-SCC100291391
2NWO 18&Over 2.5W Amanda -PTC9124615173
3NWO 18&Over 2.5W Damschroder-Bedford7323719176
4NWO 18&Over 2.5W Seifried-Inverness73191123201
5NWO 18&Over 2.5W Williams -PTC73171331243
6NWO 18&Over 2.5W Tim -SVC64171329239
7NWO 18&Over 2.5W Didion/Murawski-SCC55131735249
8NWO 18&Over 2.5W MD -Bedford46141633264
9NWO 18&Over 2.5W Trish -PTC46131736258
10NWO 18&Over 2.5W Brown-FT2892144300
11NWO 18&Over 2.5W Morgan/Pletz-SCC2862448294
12NWO 18&Over 2.5W Matt -Bedford1972347315
13NWO 18&Over 2.5W Johnson-Springfield1942652322

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.57
Dorianne Cox
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.42
Hannah Farley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Amanda Viviano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.23
Jennifer Seifried
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.14
Ashley Sheehan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Amrita Amato
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.00
Kimberly Grimm
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.86
Kassidy Bishop
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Monica Peterson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dorianne Cox + Jennifer Seifried4555% games+15.3% vs expected
Jennifer Seifried + Amrita Amato1537% games−11.8% vs expected
Ashley Sheehan + Amanda Viviano314 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Grimm + Amanda Viviano033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dorianne Cox
33W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.57
Hannah Farley
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
2.42
2.5
Amanda Viviano
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Seifried
45W–99L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Ashley Sheehan
11W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.14
2.5
Amrita Amato
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Kimberly Grimm
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Kassidy Bishop
2W–21L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Monica Peterson
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.