Teams

GEPTA/Adult 4.0W/Zaragoza/EPTC#5

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Christianne Alvarez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.69
Beth Hoy
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.64
Bianca Loya
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.45
Daniela Cano
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Erika Avila
usually #1 Singles 37%, also #2 Singles 26% · published 3.5
Allison Furman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Carla Sanchez
published 3.5
3.04
Belinda Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 3.5
3.03
Cassidy Chamales
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Camilla Pujol
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jocelyn Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Katherine Haycraft
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Leslie Zaragoza
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Miranda Silva
usually #2 Doubles 27%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Priscila Cano-Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Zaragoza
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Singles 12% · published
Tara Davis
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Valeria Delgado
usually #3 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Zaragoza + Erika Avila4153% gamesnot enough data
Miranda Silva + Tara Davis033 matchesnot enough data
Tara Davis + Jocelyn Hernandez123 matchesnot enough data
Bianca Loya + Katherine Haycraft213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christianne Alvarez
7W–5L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Beth Hoy
37W–12L career · 23 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Bianca Loya
42W–32L career · 15 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Daniela Cano
39W–20L career · 19 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Erika Avila
76W–35L career · 27 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Allison Furman
31W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carla Sanchez
2W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Belinda Fernandez
57W–57L career · type A · 30 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Cassidy Chamales
18W–15L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Camilla Pujol
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jocelyn Hernandez
22W–24L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Haycraft
25W–10L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Zaragoza
55W–49L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Miranda Silva
88W–67L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Priscila Cano-Lopez
24W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Zaragoza
71W–61L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tara Davis
65W–49L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Valeria Delgado
26W–13L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.