Teams

WC GREEN

2021 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO

6 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-04-24vs VCC SILVERLost 03
L#1 DoublesStacy Masur / Jamie Gagne vs Carleen Himel / Diane Kelly6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Wiedeman vs Nickie Le0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMaryBeth Doerr / SUSAN MORAVEK vs Emily Yeingst / Ashley Franklin6-7, 4-6
2021-04-17vs GCC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesSara Watson / Melanie Adams vs Diane Matava / Nicole Conroy6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStacy Masur / MaryBeth Doerr vs Christine Viney / Lisa Gee6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-04-10vs PRC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Wiedeman / Sara Watson vs Keri Kallaway / Lisa Lodge6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJamie Gagne vs Laura Hunter6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMaryBeth Doerr / Melanie Adams vs Robin Mortenson / Roxanne Blair6-1, 6-3
2021-04-03vs KNO BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara Watson / Melanie Adams vs Elizabeth Baesman / Kelly Lownsberry6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSUSAN MORAVEK vs Sheila Edwards0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesStacy Masur / Jamie Gagne vs Jacqueline Schultz / Lori Roach6-2, 6-2
2021-03-27vs HV GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaryBeth Doerr / Sara Watson vs Margo Ellis / Anna Larsen3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJamie Gagne vs Monica Reidelbach0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMelanie Adams / SUSAN MORAVEK vs Danielle Kennedy / Robyn Jones2-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Melanie Adams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Jamie Gagne
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Stacy Masur
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Amy Wiedeman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.67
MaryBeth Doerr
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
SUSAN MORAVEK
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Masur + Jamie Gagne4848% games+1.4% vs expected
Melanie Adams + Stacy Masur2449% games+1.1% vs expected
Melanie Adams + Amy Wiedeman4157% gamesnot enough data
Amy Wiedeman + Jamie Gagne314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Adams
59W–48L career · 4 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Jamie Gagne
75W–50L career · 4 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Stacy Masur
101W–118L career · 3 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Amy Wiedeman
36W–30L career · 2 lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
2.93
MaryBeth Doerr
48W–96L career · 4 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
3
SUSAN MORAVEK
63W–52L career · 3 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.