Teams

Greenburgh Town Park: Whaqued

2021 18&Over Women · 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-28Won 20
W#2 DoublesDana Greco / Susan Geratz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Gibson / Naomi Ortiz-Honor vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-24vs Chappaqua Swim & Tennis SparklersLost 23
W#1 DoublesSusan Geratz / Leah McVey vs Lisa Hickey / Marcia Heitlinger2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTara Taylor vs Caroline Dunlop5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDana Greco / Claire Hallock vs Rovena Juman / Nurit Praeger1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesNyle Salley vs Karen Chung2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJulie Romero / Naomi Ortiz-Honor vs IZABELLA ALEXANDROWSKI / Tara Bell6-3, 6-4
2021-06-14vs Chappaqua Swim & Tennis SparklersLost 14
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Bohan / Keira Smith vs Rovena Juman / Jessica Ulrich1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKate Greener vs Sebria Arroyo4-6, 1-2
L#2 DoublesStella Yi-Burke / Susan Geratz vs Catherine Paterra / DANA CRANE5-7
W#2 SinglesDana Niedzielska vs Kim Goldner4-6, 3-1
L#3 DoublesNaomi Ortiz-Honor / Julie Romero vs Toby Amidor / Tara Bell1-6, 4-4
W#1 DoublesLeah McVey / Keira Smith vs Jennifer Fertucci / Elyse Poole6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesNyle Salley vs Marnie Tihany3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDana Greco / Tara Taylor vs Beth Cohen / Judy Strollo3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDana Niedzielska vs Jill Liebman7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSusan Babcock / Julie Romero vs Coleen Lynam / Mary Lisa Lampe4-6, 5-7
2021-05-17vs Saw Mill Club: Nice AcesLost 23
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Bohan / Tara Taylor vs Karen Malek / Christie Otoole7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesNyle Salley vs Joanna Dejesus0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDana Greco / Leslie Gibson vs KENDLE ARCIDIACONO / Misun Kim2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesStella Yi-Burke vs Brita Loeb1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesValerie Malkin / Susan Babcock vs Brenda Sanatar / Elizabeth Harman2-6, 0-6
2021-05-11vs TIA GRINDERS 3.5Lost 14
W#1 DoublesSusan Geratz / Nyle Salley vs Julie Leblang / Anna Schuler6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesDana Niedzielska vs Marta Piksinska4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Hammond / Dana Greco vs Barbara Rosenthal / Hillary Portnoy3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesTara Taylor vs Laurie Hoffman3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesClaire Hallock / Valerie Malkin vs Jennifer Reynolds / Lillian Cutaj0-6, 2-6
2021-05-10vs Whippoorwill Club: Whippin AcesLost 14
L#1 DoublesSusan Geratz / Leah McVey vs Beth Grotta / Lauren Stern6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesNyle Salley vs Jessica Fitzgerald4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDana Greco / Catherine Hammond vs Cathy Hammes / Susan Flanagan5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDana Niedzielska vs Danielle Caravetta6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJulie Romero / Susan Babcock vs Amy Rinzler / Karen Rothenberg2-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesSusan Geratz / Stella Yi-Burke vs Lorraine Campo / Paula Park6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKate Greener vs Liz SusmanKarp6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Hammond / Dana Greco vs Kathy Goltzman / Marlo Klein7-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesNyle Salley vs Ellen Cooper2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTara Taylor / Julie Romero vs Lisa Olney / Claire Gallagher4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chappaqua Swim & Tennis Sparklers0828924274
2RRC Rye Racquettes08251532316
3Saw Mill Club: Nice Aces08231737316
4Club Fit Briarcliff Point Breakers08221742364
5Purchase: SHI Tennis Armada08192044354
6NRRC: Serve Aces08211944358
7Whippoorwill Club: Whippin Aces08192147371
8Chappaqua Swim & Tennis - Drop Shot Divas08172247348
9Greenburgh Town Park: Whaqued08172148358
10NYAC: Super Lucky Cats08162453391
11WTC: Tennisanity08152553421

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Leah McVey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Jacqueline Bohan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Claire Hallock
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Heidi Paul
published 3.5
3.19
Dana Niedzielska
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Kate Greener
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.15
Julie Romero
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Stella Yi-Burke
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Naomi Ortiz-Honor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Catherine Hammond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Nyle Salley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.75
Leslie Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Dana Greco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Keira Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Babcock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Geratz
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Tara Taylor
usually #2 Singles 20%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Valerie Malkin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Bohan + Naomi Ortiz-Honor5259% games+11.8% vs expected
Kate Greener + Leah McVey18170% games+9.9% vs expected
Leslie Gibson + Naomi Ortiz-Honor4553% games+7.0% vs expected
Jacqueline Bohan + Nyle Salley5158% games+6.6% vs expected
Stella Yi-Burke + Leah McVey7262% games+3.6% vs expected
Catherine Hammond + Naomi Ortiz-Honor3550% games+2.5% vs expected
Stella Yi-Burke + Kate Greener181551% games+1.5% vs expected
Catherine Hammond + Jacqueline Bohan2443% games+1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leah McVey
139W–67L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
Jacqueline Bohan
96W–79L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Claire Hallock
14W–25L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Heidi Paul
23W–26L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Dana Niedzielska
23W–27L career · 4 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Kate Greener
130W–76L career · 2 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
Julie Romero
22W–74L career · 5 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Stella Yi-Burke
132W–116L career · 3 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
Naomi Ortiz-Honor
94W–119L career · 3 lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Catherine Hammond
44W–91L career · 3 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
Nyle Salley
54W–66L career · 6 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
3
Leslie Gibson
41W–55L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Dana Greco
64W–62L career · 7 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
Keira Smith
82W–38L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Babcock
8W–31L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Geratz
23W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tara Taylor
24W–23L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Valerie Malkin
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.