WHRC-Lipke

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.45 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51

Heather MacPherson

usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.45

Karen Harlow

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.43

Gareth Harries

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5

3.40

Andrew Roessler

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4

3.32

Jeff Lipke

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.28

Neville Mehta

usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5

3.27

Gail Bolte

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.21

Octavian Tudorache

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.14

Kyla Kelsay

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3

3.11

Ann Skoog

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.01

Toni Eastwood

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5

Heather MacPherson

64W–35L career

0%77%23%

3.51

3.5

Karen Harlow

79W–58L career

0%90%10%

3.45

3.5

Gareth Harries

39W–17L career

0%91%9%

3.43

Andrew Roessler

26W–23L career · type A

64%37%0%

3.40

3.5

Jeff Lipke

105W–86L career

0%99%1%

3.32

3.5

Neville Mehta

112W–80L career

0%99%0%

3.28

3.5

Gail Bolte

93W–76L career

0%99%0%

3.27

3.5

Octavian Tudorache

66W–52L career

2%98%0%

3.21

Kyla Kelsay

7W–8L career

0%45%55%

3.14

3.5

Ann Skoog

43W–66L career

10%90%0%

3.11

Toni Eastwood

44W–73L career

0%79%21%

3.01

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.