Teams

MONTE VISTA HS 40AW3.5B

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Margaret Gruen
published
3.67
3.63
Viviana Meyer
published
3.39
Laura Dommes
published
3.33
Susie Hansen
published
3.30
Cecily Barclay
published 3.5
3.29
Shawn Young
published
3.27
Yolla Elahmadie
published
3.27
Suzanne Peck
published
3.19
Nanny Tunnell
published
3.17
Andrea Eubanks
published 3.5
3.17
Kerry Marx
published
3.14
Trish Nornhold
published
3.14
Dona Ray
published 3.5
3.13
Lea Baldacci
published
3.10
Wendy Greer
published
3.02
Christi Deakin
published 3.5
2.85
Kirsten Miller
published
Jana Vojdani
published
Rachel Gilchrist
published
Sally Krapf
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Dommes + Susie Hansen4159% gamesnot enough data
Shawn Young + Trish Nornhold224 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Gilchrist + Trish Nornhold033 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Greer + Susie Hansen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Gruen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Cortny Christensen
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Viviana Meyer
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Laura Dommes
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
Susie Hansen
20W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Cecily Barclay
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Shawn Young
21W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Yolla Elahmadie
5W–17L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Suzanne Peck
14W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Nanny Tunnell
4W–15L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Andrea Eubanks
6W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Kerry Marx
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.17
Trish Nornhold
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Dona Ray
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
Lea Baldacci
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Wendy Greer
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Christi Deakin
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
Kirsten Miller
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Jana Vojdani
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Gilchrist
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sally Krapf
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.