Teams

WHRC-Moreno 8.0

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Erica Drake
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Emily McBride
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.84
Deanna Lautenbach
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.79
Kris Kelly-Koster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Kristi Vargas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Sharon Kim-Geib
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Tony Moreno
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Alan Lave
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Parth Pandey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Jason Dortch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Rich Rice
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.32
Jeff Lipke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Erica Drake
45W–25L career
0%97%2%
3.87
4
Emily McBride
72W–73L career
0%98%2%
3.86
4.5
Deanna Lautenbach
55W–83L career
56%44%0%
3.84
4
Kris Kelly-Koster
79W–101L career
0%99%0%
3.79
4
Kristi Vargas
82W–131L career
1%99%0%
3.77
4
Sharon Kim-Geib
75W–53L career
1%99%0%
3.72
4
Tony Moreno
308W–152L career
2%98%0%
3.68
4
Alan Lave
19W–22L career
8%92%0%
3.65
4
Parth Pandey
26W–32L career
9%91%0%
3.62
4
Jason Dortch
108W–99L career · type A
19%81%0%
3.55
4
Rich Rice
65W–70L career
46%54%0%
3.46
3.5
Jeff Lipke
105W–86L career
0%99%1%
3.32

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.